Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;20:79. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00370-7

Table 3.

Discussion domains (n = 71)

PLUS (good or positive performance) discussion DELTA (case changes or poor performance) discussion
Discussion Domain n % PEARLS versus non-PEARLS Total Discussion Domain n % PEARLS versus non-PEARLS Total
Decision Makinga 40 17.24% SIMULATION ‘PEARLS’ FRAMEWORK DISCUSSION REPORTS Decision Makinga 22 13.41% SIMULATION ‘PEARLS’ FRAMEWORK DISCUSSION REPORTS
Technical Skillsa 29 12.50% Technical Skillsa 24 14.63%
Communicationa 33 14.22% Communicationa 22 13.41%
Resource Utilisationa 26 11.21% Resource Utilisationa 18 10.98%
Leadershipa 20 8.62%

Total

195 (84.05%)

Leadershipa 7 4.27%

Total

107 (65.24%)

Situational Awarenessa 10 4.31% Situational Awarenessa 9 5.49%
Teamworka 37 15.95% Teamworka 5 3.05%
Family / Social 2 0.86% NON-SIMULATION FRAMEWORK DISCUSSION REPORTS Family / Social 7 4.27% NON-SIMULATION FRAMEWORK DISCUSSION REPORTS
Bad Outcome / Distress 4 1.72% Bad Outcome / Distress 11 6.71%
Preparation / Pre-arrival 21 9.05%

Total

37 (15.95%)

Preparation / Pre-arrival 5 3.05%

Total

57 (34.76%)

Space / Equipment / Environmental 6 2.59% Space / Equipment / Environmental 21 12.8%
Unclassified / Other 4 1.72% Unclassified / Other 13 7.93%
TOTAL 100% 232 TOTAL 100% 164

aPromoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS) [19].