Table 1.
Characteristic | All patients (n = 100), n | HER2− (n = 89), n | HER2+ (n = 11), n | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | .536 | |||
Male | 55 | 50 | 5 | |
Female | 45 | 39 | 6 | |
Age, median (range) | 68 (33–84) | 69 (35–84) | 65 (33–79) | .561 |
ECOG PS | .854 | |||
0 | 55 | 51 | 4 | |
1 | 38 | 34 | 4 | |
2/3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | |
Tumor grade | .698 | |||
G2 | 59 | 52 | 7 | |
G3 | 36 | 33 | 3 | |
Gx | 5 | 4 | 1 | |
Tumor site | .901 | |||
Intrahepatic | 36 | 32 | 4 | |
Extrahepatic | 28 | 24 | 4 | |
Ampullary | 23 | 21 | 2 | |
Gallbladder | 13 | 12 | 1 | |
Resection margins | 1.000* | |||
R0 | 94 | 83 | 11 | |
R1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | |
R2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
T stage | .051 | |||
T1 | 19 | 18 | 1 | |
T2 | 28 | 24 | 4 | |
T3 | 49 | 44 | 5 | |
T4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
Tx | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
N stage | .379 | |||
N0 | 39 | 35 | 4 | |
N1 | 40 | 37 | 3 | |
Nx | 21 | 17 | 4 | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | .201 | |||
Yes | 50 | 47 | 3 | |
No | 50 | 42 | 8 | |
Type of adjuvant treatment | 1.000** | |||
Gemcitabine | 44 | 41 | 3 | |
Capecitabine | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
Other regimens | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
Adjuvant radiotherapy | .515 | |||
Yes | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
No | 96 | 85 | 11 | |
Type of first‐line chemotherapy | .145a | |||
Gemcitabine | 12 | 9 | 3 | |
Gemcitabine + platinum | 22 | 19 | 3 | |
Fluoropyrimidines | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
Fluoropyrimidines + platinum | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
Other regimens | 6 | 6 | 0 | |
Best supportive care | 12 | 8 | 4 | |
Not available | 6 | 5 | 1 |
Combination treatment versus monotherapy versus best supportive care.
Radical resection versus R1/R2 Resection.
Gemcitabine versus others.
Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; G, grade.