Table 4.

Results [Median (Range)] of First Photograph, including Both Measurement Rounds of Both Blinded Raters According to the Analysis Reported by Chang et al²¹

Ratio, c/nc or l/r	Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate				Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
	Non-NAM		NAM		Non-NAM		NAM
	Moderate	Severe	Moderate	Severe	Moderate	Severe	Moderate	Severe
NH	0.7 (0.5–0.7)	0.5 (0.3–0.6)	0.6 (0.5–0.8)	0.5 (0.2–0.7)	0.9 (0.6–2.3)	0.5 (0.0–1.1)	0.7 (0.4–1.7)	0.8 (0.3–1.4)
NW	2.2 (1.4–3.1)	3.2 (2.3–3.6)	1.6 (1.5–2.2)	3.9 (1.7–6.2)	1.4 (0.5–1.8)	1.4 (0.0–3.4)	1.6 (0.6–2.7)	1.4 (0.8–4.8)
¼ med. part	0.6 (0.5–0.7)	0.5 (0.2–0.6)	0.6 (0.5–0.8)	0.4 (0.1–0.7)	0.9 (0.5–2.4)	0.5 (0.0–1.0)	0.8 (0.2–1.8)	0.9 (0.1–1.4)
Nasal sill height	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Nostril area	1.9 (0.9–2.3)	2.2 (1.1–3.1)	1.2 (0.8–1.4)	2.5 (0.4–7.6)	1.2 (0.8–2.4)	0.9 (0.0–3.1)	1.2 (0.6–2.0)	0.9 (0.6–2.9)
H-t-W	0.3 (0.2–1.1)	0.2 (0.1–0.3)	0.4 (0.2–0.5)	0.1 (0.1–0.2)	0.7 (0.4–4.0)	0.3 (0.0–0.4)	0.5 (0.2–2.9)	0.4 (0.2–0.9)
ColAng, degree	70.6 (50.9–119.1)	51.1 (36.3–93.1)	86.4 (60.2–115.7)	51.0 (31.0–79.3)	86.9 (66.5–116.8)	72.4 (0.0–83.7)	78.9 (39.5–116.1)	74.1 (0.0–91.0)

Nasal sill height was not calculated because of missing lip and nose competence before treatment (surgery and non-NAM or NAM Therapy).