Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2020 Aug 3;142(32):13795–13804. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04716

Table 2.

Dependence of the Calculated (Calc.) and Experimentally Measured (Exptl.) ET and PCET Rate Constants on the Calculated R¯ET.a

Proton acceptor Δ(QRuQPA) (e2) pKa of proton acceptor Calc. |slope| (Å−1) Exptl. |slope| (Å−1)
ET reaction
N/A 0 N/A 1.37 1.34b
PCET reaction
[HPO4]2− 4 7.20c 0.59 0.59d
Imidazole 2 6.95e 0.95 0.87f
a

The calculated (experimental) magnitudes of the slopes are obtained from the calculated (experimental) ln(k) versus the calculated R¯ET values from Table 1.

b

Value for ET in Ru/Ru system (Fig. 1A) determined by plotting the experimental rate constants from Ref. 13 as a function of the calculated R¯ET values.

c

Value from Ref. 72.

d

Value for Ru/Tyr system (Fig. 1B) with phosphate as proton acceptor determined by plotting the experimental rate constants from Ref. 50 as a function of the calculated R¯ET values.

e

Value from Ref. 73.

f

Value for Ru/Tyr system with imidazole as proton acceptor determined by plotting the experimental rate constants measured herein as a function of the calculated R¯ET values.