Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 4;41(35):3325–3333. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa571

Table 2.

Changes to reclassification across three cardiovascular prediction models, in the derivation cohort

From model 1 (original SCORE) to model 2 (recalibrated SCORE)
Status after follow-up Predicted 10-year risk (original SCORE) Predicted 10-year risk (recalibrated SCORE)
Reclassified
Net correctly reclassified
<5% >5% Increased risk Decreased risk
Died from CVD (n = 338)
<5% 67 10 3% −11%
>5% 47 214 14%
Did not die from CVD (n = 14 260)
<5% 8885 288 2% 15%
>5% 2377 2710 17%
Categorical net reclassification improvement (95% CI) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.08) P = 0.09
Continuous net reclassification improvement (95% CI)     0.19 (0.08 to 0.29) P < 0.0001
From model 2 (recalibrated SCORE) to model 3 (HAPIEE SCORE)
Status after follow-up Predicted 10-year risk (recalibrated SCORE) Predicted 10-year risk (HAPIEE SCORE)
Reclassified
Net correctly reclassified
<5% >5% Increased risk Decreased risk
Died from CVD (n = 338)
<5% 90 24 7% 2.4%
>5% 16 208 5%
Did not die from CVD (n = 14 260)
<5% 10 671 591 4% 0.4%
>5% 654 2344 5%
Categorical net reclassification improvement (95% CI) 0.03 (−0.01 to 0.07) P = 0.14
Continuous net reclassification improvement (95% CI)     0.44 (0.33 to 0.55) P < 0.0001
From model 1 (original SCORE) to model 3 (HAPIEE SCORE)
Status after follow-up Predicted 10-year risk (original SCORE) Predicted 10-year risk (HAPIEE SCORE)
Reclassified
Net correctly reclassified
<5% >5% Increased risk Decreased risk
Died from CVD (n = 338) 
<5% 60 17 5% −8.6%
>5% 46 215 14%
Did not die from CVD (n = 14 260)
<5% 8774 399 3% 15%
>5% 2551 2536 18%
Categorical net reclassification improvement (95% CI) 0.07 (0.02 to 0.11) P = 0.005
Continuous net reclassification improvement (95% CI)     0.45 (0.34 to 0.56) P < 0.0001

CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease.