Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Apr 9;28(2):284–307. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1749228

Table 2.

Independent samples t-test results comparing caregivers and controls on cognitive outcomes (n = 94).

Caregivers
Control participants
M SD M SD t-test Cohen’s d
Working Memory
 N-Back: 2-Back Condition
  Percentage of items wrongly reported 1.58 0.29 1.25 0.33 4.67*** 1.06
  Number of items correctly identified 0.93 0.31 1.17 0.17 −4.53*** −.96
  Average reaction time 1403.92 334.67 1118.80 297.36 4.37 .90
 N-Back: 3-Back Condition
  Percentage of items wrongly reported 1.40 0.97 1.21 0.30 2.63** .26
  Number of items correctly identified 1.05 0.22 1.18 0.09 3.71*** −.77
  Average reaction time 1188.55 337.26 963.60 244.48 −3.70*** .76
Episodic Memory
 WMS-III Word-Recall Subtest (Sum of Trials 1–4) 29.25 6.56 35.51 4.51 −5.39*** −1.11
 WMS-III Word-Recall Subtest Intrusions (Sum of Trials 1–4) 0.27 0.24 0.22 0.28 0.62 .19
Attention
 Stroop Test 2.12 0.24 2.01 0.37 1.71 .35
Processing Speed
 Pattern Comparison 34.17 8.59 43.45 7.08 −5.71 −1.17
 Letter Comparison 23.25 6.01 29.55 5.33 −5.37 −1.11
 Digit Symbol 54.76 12.38 66.23 10.65 −4.81 −.99
Executive Functioning
 Connections 0.52 0.17 0.59 0.12 −2.18*** −.47
Visuospatial Processing
 Mental Rotation: Percent correct 79.61 7.95 83.32 6.63 −2.45 −.50
 Mental Rotation: Average reaction time 3.55 0.17 3.52 0.17 0.86 .17
Implicit Memory
 Word-Stem Completion Test 10.46 3.78 11.17 4.06 −0.87 −.18
*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.