. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 9.

Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):603–615. doi: 10.1037/emo0000753

Table 4.

Hierarchical linear regression model of Satisfaction with Life on covariates, mean affect, and emodiversity

	Step 1 b(SE)	Step 2 b(SE)	Step 3 b(SE)
Constant	3.63 (0.21)^***	2.37 (0.24)^***	0.97 (0.63)
Age	0.01 (0.003)^***	−0.0002 (0.003)	−0.0001 (0.003)
Gender (male = reference)	0.03 (0.07)	0.06 (0.06)	0.07 (0.06)
Education	0.08 (0.01)^***	0.08 (0.01)^***	0.08 (0.01)^***
Months between measures	−0.004 (0.002)^*	−0.003 (0.002)	−0.003 (0.002)
Study (M2 = reference)	−0.17 (0.09)	−0.07 (0.08)	−0.07 (0.08)
Avg. PA		0.70 (0.05)^***	0.54 (0.07)^***
Avg. NA		−0.35 (0.15)^*	0.19 (0.28)
Num. positive emodiversity days			−0.03 (0.06)
Num. negative emodiversity days			0.04 (0.07)
Positive emodiversity			0.74 (0.26)^**
Negative emodiversity			−0.30 (0.13)^*
R²	0.04	0.21	0.22
Residual Std. Error	1.28	1.16	1.15
F	10.05^***	51.11^***	33.90^***
F_change		148.21^***	3.19^*^a

Note: N = 1345; standard errors and p-values for regressors in steps 2 and 3 obtained using heteroscedasticity consistent estimators.

The level of significance for change in R² from Step 2 to Step 3, p = 01, does not survive Bonferroni correction at .05/11

p < .05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001