Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 16;7(6):1735–1745. doi: 10.1002/nop2.558

Table 1.

The participants' demographic details

Variable Diabetes patient Health professionals Total
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Gender
Male 10 (43.4) 8 (0.8) 18 (54.5)
Female 13 (56.5) 2 (0.2) 15 (45.4)
Age group
20–40 4 (17.3) 9 (0.9) 13 (39.3)
41–60 11 (47.8) 1 (0.1) 12 (36.3)
60 and older 8 (34.7) 0 (0) 8 (24.2)
Education
Illiterate 16 (69.5) 0 (0) 16 (48.4)
Junior high school 3 (13) 0 (0) 3 (9.0)
High school diploma 3 (13) 0 (0) 3 (9.0)
Associate degree 1 (4.3) 3 (0.3) 4 (12.1)
Bachelor's degree 0 (0) 4 (0.4) 4 (12.1)
Master's degree 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 1 (3)
PhD 0 (0) 2 (0.2) 2 (6)
T2DM history in 1st‐degree relatives
Yes 18 (78.2)
No 5 (21.7)
Occupation status
Employed 4 (17.3)
Retired 4 (17.3)
Housewife 10 (43.4)
Unemployed 5 (21.7)
Time since diagnosis
<1 year 2 (8.6)
1–5 years 5 (21.7)
>5 years 16 (69.5)
Household income
Inadequate to cover living expenses 16 (69.5)
Sufficient to cover living expenses 7 (30.4)
Complications of diabetes
Yes 8 (34.7)
No 15 (65.2)
Physical activity
Regular 5 (21.7)
Irregular 8 (34.7)
No physical activity 10 (43.4)
Drug use and smoking
Yes 4 (17.3)
No 19 (82.6)
Visit by doctor
Regular 14 (60.8)
Irregular 9 (39.1)
Medications
Metformin only 8 (34.7)
Metformin & glibenclamide 8 (34.7)
Metformin & insulin 7 (30.4)