TABLE 4.

Three main conditions of sufficiency analysis for satisfaction, perceived value, and future intentions (intermediate solution).

Frequency cutoff: 1			SAT			∼SAT			PV			∼PV			FI			∼FI
			Consistency cutoff: 0.85			Consistency cutoff: 0.85			Consistency cutoff: 0.83			Consistency cutoff: 0.85			Consistency cutoff: 0.86			Consistency cutoff: 0.85
			1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3	1	2	3
Service quality			•			◯	◯	◯	•	•	•	◯			–	–	–	–	–	–
Satisfaction			–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	•		•	•
Perceived value				•		◯	◯	◯	–	–	–	–	–	–	•	•		•	•	•
Future intentions			–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Subjective well-being							•	•	•					◯			•		◯
Pleasure					•			◯		•			◯	◯				◯	◯	◯
Arousal					•		•			•	•			◯			◯
Men						•										•				•
Age					•			◯		◯	•		◯						◯
Raw coverage			0.71	0.68	0.32	0.45	0.31	0.30	0.58	0.32	0.30	0.81	0.49	0.36	0.66	0.39	0.36	0.55	0.42	0.41
Unique coverage			0.08	0.07	0.01	0.12	0.01	0.02	0.11	0.01	0.01	0.25	0.03	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.03	0.01
Consistency			0.88	0.86	0.80	0.77	0.86	0.87	0.84	0.85	0.84	0.82	0.82	0.90	0.90	0.85	0.87	0.89	0.89	0.83
Overall solution consistency					0.79			0.75			0.81			0.77			0.80			0.81
Overall solution coverage					0.86			0.72			0.72			0.88			0.84			0.79

∼, absence (low levels) of condition; •, presence (high levels) of condition; ◯, absence (low levels) of condition. SAT, satisfaction; PV, perceived value; FI, future Intentions. –, do not calculated according to the theoretical model. Expected vector for satisfaction: 1.-0.1.-0.1.1.1.1.0 (0: absent; 1: present), expected vector for ∼ satisfaction: 0.-0.0.-0.0.0.0.0.1 (0: absent; 1: present), expected vector for perceived value: 1.-.-.-0.1.1.1.1.0 (0: absent; 1: present), expected vector for ∼ perceived value: 0.-.-.-0.0.0.0.0.1 (0: absent; 1: present), expected vector for future intentions: -0.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.0 (0: absent; 1: present), expected vector for ∼ future intentions: -0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 (0: absent; 1: present).