Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;10:16794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73871-x

Table 2.

Effect of P2Y12 inhibitors on frequencies of clinical outcomes in ACS patients.

Clopidogrel Prasugrel Ticagrelor Cangrelor
Myocardial infarction
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.75 (0.63–0.89) 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 0.94 (0.78–1.13)
Prasugrel 1.33 (1.12–1.58) 1.00 1.17 (0.93–1.48) 1.25 (0.97–1.61)
Ticagrelor 1.13 (0.92–1.39) 0.85 (0.67–1.07) 1.00 1.06 (0.80–1.40)
Cangrelor 1.07 (0.88–1.29) 0.80 (0.62–1.04) 0.94 (0.71–1.24) 1.00
Stroke
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.96 (0.74–1.23) 1.10 (0.88–1.36) 1.08 (0.49–2.37)
Prasugrel 1.05 (0.81–1.35) 1.00 1.15 (0.85–1.55) 1.13 (0.49–2.59)
Ticagrelor 0.91(0.74–1.13) 0.87 (0.64–1.18) 1.00 0.98 (0.43–2.23)
Cangrelor 0.93 (0.42–2.05) 0.89 (0.39–2.04) 1.02 (0.45–2.31) 1.00
Cardiovascular mortality
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.85 (0.75–0.97) 0.82 (0.73–0.93) 1.00 (0.52–1.92)
Prasugrel 1.17 (1.03–1.34) 1.00 0.97 (0.83–1.13) 1.17 (0.60–2.29)
Ticagrelor 1.21 (1.08–1.37) 1.03 (0.89–1.21) 1.00 1.21 (0.62–2.36)
Cangrelor 1.00 (0.52–1.92) 0.85 (0.44–1.66) 0.82 (0.42–1.60) 1.00
MACE
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.80 (0.69–0.94) 0.89 (0.75–1.05) 0.90 (0.75–1.07)
Prasugrel 1.25 (1.07–1.46) 1.00 1.10 (0.91–1.34) 1.12 (0.88–1.42)
Ticagrelor 1.13 (0.95–1.34) 0.91 (0.75–1.10) 1.00 1.01 (0.79–1.30)
Cangrelor 1.12 (0.93–1.34) 0.89 (0.70–1.14) 0.99 (0.77–1.27) 1.00
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.49 (0.38–0.63) 0.72 (0.57–0.90) 0.59 (0.43–0.81)
Prasugrel 2.03 (1.58–2.62) 1.00 1.46 (1.08–1.97) 1.20 (0.80–1.81)
Ticagrelor 1.39 (1.12–1.74) 0.69 (0.51–0.93) 1.00 0.83 (0.56–1.22)
Cangrelor 1.69 (1.23–2.32) 0.83 (0.55–1.25) 1.21 (0.82–1.78) 1.00
All-cause mortality
Clopidogrel 1.00 0.91 (0.76–1.09) 0.88 (0.73–1.05) 0.75 (0.46–1.22)
Prasugrel 1.10 (0.92–1.32) 1.00 0.97 (0.78–1.20) 0.83 (0.50–1.38)
Ticagrelor 1.14 (0.95–1.37) 1.03 (0.83–1.28) 1.00 0.86 (0.51–1.43)
Cangrelor 1.33 (0.82–2.15) 1.21 (0.72–2.02) 1.17 (0.70–1.95) 1.00

Results are the Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) in the column-defining therapy compared with the Odds Ratios in the row-defining therapy. For efficacy and safety, Odds Ratio < 1 favors the column-defining therapy. Significant results are shown in bold.

ACS acute coronary syndrome, MACE major cardiovascular events.