Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;3(10):e2019861. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19861

Table 2. QALY and ICER for Single-Joint Contracture From Societal Perspective.

Joint type and severity Treatment combinationa Mean (SD) ICER (MCSE), $/QALYb
Total cost, $ Lifetime QALYs
MCP joint
Low severity PNA-PNA-PNA 3339 (544) 15.09 (4.95) Reference case
PNA-PNA-LF 9448 (4003) 15.12 (4.97) 212 647 (36 000)
LF-LF-LF 25 419 (6785) 15.17 (4.98) 293 592 (48 000)
High severity PNA-PNA-PNA 3512 (462) 14.64 (4.80) Reference case
PNA-PNA-LF 11 225 (3653) 14.72 (4.83) 93 932 (16 500)
LF-LF-LF 26 527 (6879) 14.88 (4.87) 98 624 (26 333)
PIP joint
Low severity PNA-PNA-PNA 3567 (399) 15.03 (4.95) Reference case
PNA-PNA-LF 11 789 (3217) 15.06 (4.95) 263 726 (29 000)
LF-LF-LF 27 940 (6465) 15.12 (4.97) 263 427 (64 000)
High severity PNA-PNA-PNA 3640 (338) 14.59 (4.80) Reference case
PNA-PNA-LF 12 574 (2649) 14.62 (4.81) 421 843 (24 000)
LF-LF-LF 31 472 (5307) 14.66 (4.82) 408 244 (25 500)

Abbreviations: CCH, collagenase clostridium histolyticum; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; LF, limited fasciectomy; MCP, metacarpophalangeal; MCSE, Monte Carlo standard error; PNA, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.

a

A total of 27 treatment sequences were modeled, as follows: (1) CCH-PNA-LF, (2) CCH-LF-PNA, (3) PNA-CCH-LF, (4) PNA-LF-CCH, (5) LF-CCH- PNA, (6) LF-PNA-CCH, (7) CCH-CCH-PNA, (8) CCH-CCH-LF, (9) CCH-PNA-CCH, (10) CCH-LF-CCH, (11) PNA-PNA-LF, (12) PNA-PNA-CCH, (13) PNA-CCH-PNA, (14) PNA-LF-PNA, (15) LF-LF-CCH, (16) LF-LF-PNA, (17) LF-CCH-LF, (18) LF-PNA-LF, (19) PNA-CCH-CCH, (20) LF-CCH-CCH, (21) CCH-PNA-PNA, (22) LF-PNA-PNA, (23) CCH-LF-LF, (24) PNA-LF-LF, (25) CCH-CCH-CCH, (26) PNA-PNA-PNA, and (27) LF-LF-LF.

b

ICER compared with next best treatment combination with highest net monetary benefit.