Table 4.
Mean approach | ROC approach | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Objective measure | Perceived change of Mobility | N | Mean | Lower CI | Upper CI | SRM | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | LR + | LR – | AUC | |
Arm ROM | 1 | Mild improvement | 11 | 23.00 | 11.62 | 34.39 | 1.19 | 17.66 | 0.55 | 0.70 | 1.82 | 0.65 | 0.64 |
0 | No change | 11 | 13.53 | 6.60 | 20.46 | 1.15 | |||||||
Perceived change of ADL | N | Mean | Lower CI | Upper CI | SRM | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | LR + | LR – | AUC | ||
Arm ROM | 1 | Mild improvement | 13 | 21.20 | 11.22 | 31.19 | 1.25 | 17.16 | 0.62 | 0.73 | 2.26 | 0.53 | 0.67 |
0 | No change | 12 | 11.58 | 4.53 | 18.63 | 0.97 | |||||||
DT Gait speed | 1 | Mild improvement | 13 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 1.38 | 0.13 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 2.54 | 0.42 | 0.67 |
0 | No change | 12 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.86 |
ROM, range of motion; DT, dual-task; ADL, activities daily living; CI, confidence interval; SRM, standardized response mean; LR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR–, negative likelihood ratio; AUC, area under the curve.