Table 3.
Authors & Year | Population | Patient Numbers | Patient Satisfaction | Use Virtual Clinic Again? | Physician Satisfaction | Proportions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azad et al. [13] | Community | 99 | Yes | Yes | Yes | 92% patients satisfied, 88% of physicians |
Catic et al. [18] | NH | 47 | - | - | - | NR |
Chang et al. [14] | Community | 199 | - | - | - | NR |
Hale et al. [19] | NH | 37 | Yes | - | - | 83.3% technical success rate |
Hui et al. [20] | NH | 200 | Yes | - | - | 96% patients satisfied |
Lillicrap et al. [12] | Community | 84 | Yes | - | Yes | High levels of patient/physician satisfaction (Numbers not reported) |
Morgan et al. [15] | Community | 169 | Yes | Yes | - | Patient Satisfaction*: Mean = 4.66/5, SD = 0.11 |
Powers & Buckner [17] | Community | 45 | Yes | - | - | 98% patients satisfied |
Powers et al. [16] | Community | 95 | Yes | Yes | - | Patient Satisfaction*: Mean = 4.73/5 |
Abbreviations: NH: nursing home; NR: not reported; SD: standard deviation. *Both questionnaries were five point Likert scale questionnaires developed by the individual studies.