Table 5.

Educational attainment models: logistic regression results for men and women.

	Men				Women
	Simple model		Full model		Simple model		Full model
	Coeff.	SE	Coeff.	SE	Coeff.	SE	Coeff.	SE
Intercept	2.54***	.076	1.99***	.186	1.42***	.048	.609***	.131
Conflict (topcoded)	−.023*	.010	−.022*	.010	−.020**	.006	−.009	.007
Cohort (age in 1992) (ref = 18+)
3 to 6	−1.08***	.116	−1.51***	.141	−.583***	.083	−.588***	.147
7 to 10	−.753***	.133	−1.11***	.155	−.440***	.090	−.705***	.124
11 to 15	−.542***	.138	−.836***	.156	−.151	.098	−.353**	.125
16 to 17	.568^	.326	.340	.344	.075	.171	−.125	.194
Conflict * Cohort (ref = 18+)
3 to 6	.011	.015	.012	.016	−.008	.011	−.021	.017
7 to 10	.009	.018	.012	.020	.009	.012	−.029*	.015
11 to 15	−.001	.018	.007	.020	−.011	.013	−.009	.015
16 to 17	−.081**	.028	−.076**	.029	.011	.025	−.006	.029
Parents’ educational attainment (ref = None)
Primary	---	---	.328^	.182	---	---	.419***	.114
Basic	---	---	.192	.175	---	---	.538***	.117
Secondary	---	---	.976***	.166	---	---	1.18***	.132
Higher	---	---	1.60***	.212	---	---	2.87***	.432
Unknown	---	---	.162	.292	---	---	.549**	.179
Ethnicity (ref. Tajik)
Kyrgyz	---	---	−.329	.512	---	---	.176	.453
Russian	---	---	.789	1.03	---	---	.851	.535
Uzbek	---	---	.140	.118	---	---	.455***	.097
Other	---	---	−.691	.657	---	---	.017	.669
Urban	---	---	.291**	.101	---	---	.319***	.077
Residence in GBAO	---	---	1.36***	.271	---	---	1.97***	.233
Altitude (in 000s of meters)	---	---	−.188	.117	---	---	−.212*	.097
N = AIC	4367.7		3776.2		7910.7		5112.2

Note: The dependent variable is a dichotomous indicator of educational attainment, divided into less than secondary (0), and at least secondary attainment (1). A score of (1) includes any higher education experience. Signif. codes: 0 = ***, 0.001 = ** 0.01, * 0.05 ^ 0.1.