Table 2.
Hypotheses and Explanations
| Hypotheses | Context | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| • Nonracial Amenities: Racial and ethnic composition of neighborhoods does not affect which neighborhoods gentrify. | Low-segregation | • racial and ethnic composition of neighborhoods does not constrain housing choices in low-segregation places |
| • Diversity: Gentrification favors racially diverse neighborhoods over homogeneous white or minority neighborhoods | Low-segregation | • distinct cultural preferences of gentrifiers for “diversity” can be fulfilled in low-segregation places where mixed-race neighborhoods are more prevalent |
| • Minority Avoidance/Racial Hierarchy: gentrification favors neighborhoods with fewer minorities and exhibits a racial hierarchy in which neighborhoods with more blacks are at the bottom | High or low-segregation | • neighborhood preferences/bias |
| • Minority Attraction/Reverse Racial Hierarchy: gentrification favors neighborhoods with more minorities and exhibits a reversed racial hierarchy in which neighborhoods with more blacks are at the top | Recent wave gentrification (1990s/2000s) | • changing preferences/biases or distinct hierarchy in Seattle |
| • state-driven policies (transit, public housing transformation) | ||
| • rise of middle-class minorities | ||
| • immigration to black neighborhoods attracting gentrification | ||
| • immigration to other neighborhoods deflecting gentrification to black neighborhoods |