Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;128(10):107004. doi: 10.1289/EHP7246

Figure 2.

Figure 2 is a set of two forest plots compares the incident rate ratios estimates for the base model with estimates from time-varying models using various lagged moving average estimates (1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-y) of exposure for all cancers that were nominally significant at a 0.05 level in the primary analysis (all, lung, oral, rectal, liver, skin, breast, and kidney cancers).

Estimated incident rate ratios (95% CIs) associated with a 10-μg/m3 increase of PM2.5 and selected cancer type incidence from 2002–2011 using time-varying models and compared with the base (time-independent) model. Numerical estimates are included in Table S2. Open circles represent that estimates were not statistically significant at a 0.05 level. Diamonds represent the base (time-independent) model. Models adjusted for percentage of the county in various age buckets; percentage male; percentage white, black, Hispanic, and other; percentage who did not graduate high school, graduated high school, or obtained more education than high school; median income, rent, and home value; percentage below 150% poverty; percentage working class; percentage unemployed; percentage living in a rural area; percentage smokers; percentage alcohol consumption; percentage who are physically active; and percentage of individuals in a county who are obese as well as indicator variables for urban/rural, state, and year. The primary (time-independent) model used a LOESS model with 3 df for all covariates. The linear models used linear yearly estimates for all covariates and 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-y moving average estimates for PM2.5 exposure. The LOESS model was a locally weighted smoothing model with 3 df for all covariates with a 15-y moving average lagged estimate for PM2.5 exposure. Note: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; PM2.5, particles <2.5μm in aerodynamic diameter; LOESS, locally weighted smoothing model.