Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Sep 23;586(7827):145–150. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2761-3

Extended Data Table 1 -. Ligand energies by different refinement schemes.

Comparative table of ligand energies when ligands are refined using phenix.eLBOW generated restraints and the PHENIX force field versus when ligands are decoupled from the receptor environment and refined with PHENIX-OPLS3e/VSGB2.1. Energies were evaluated by Prime with OPLS3e/VSGB2.1.

Compound Energy CIF refinement (kcal/mol) Energy OPLS3e/VSGB2.1 (kcal/mol) Delta (kcal/mol)
VM2 65.80 −93.28 −159.08
21 146.35 −91.09 −237.44
40e 702.53 −127.58 −829.11
40o 128.09 −136.21 −264.30
40q 200.53 −115.57 −316.10
41q, confA 199.19 −118.32 −317.51
41q, conf B 284.39 −120.96 −405.35
46 84.43 −82.77 −167.20
47 107.20 −68.53 −175.73