Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;22(9):e17831. doi: 10.2196/17831

Table 2.

Effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms in the subgroup analyses of studies comparing computerized cognitive behavior therapy in adolescents and young adults with active treatment and passive controls at posttreatment.

Variable Ncoma Nparb Effect size Heterogeneity P NNTc
g 95% CI I 2 95% CI
Diagnostic focusd





.63

Anxiety 8 464 0.32e 0.04 to 0.60 50.78 0 to 78
5.56

Depression 9 1152 0.44f 0.21 to 0.67 75.44 53 to 87 4.1

Both 4 182 0.55e 0.13 to 0.96 0 0 to 85
3.31
Age groupd





.29

Adolescents 12 1027 0.34g 0.14 to 0.54 61.51 28 to 79
5.26

Young adults 9 771 0.50f 0.28 to 0.73 39.7 0 to 72
3.62
Guidanced





.56

Guided 10 771 0.46f 0.23 to 0.70 56.96 13 to 79
3.91

Self-guided 11 1027 0.37g 0.16 to 0.58 58.97 20 to 79
4.85
Adherenced





.77

Low 6 779 0.39e 0.09 to 0.69 77.56 50 to 90
4.59

High 10 737 0.48f 0.23 to 0.72 62.06 25 to 81
3.76
Recruitment typed





.53

Clinical 4 376 0.24 −0.11 to 0.59 0 0 to 85
7.46

Community 5 462 0.50g 0.18 to 0.82 78.12 47 to 91
3.62

University/school 12 960 0.44f 0.23 to 0.65 50.27 3 to 74
4.1
Number of modulesd





.21

<5 3 138 0.65g 0.20 to 1.11 0 0 to 90
2.82

5-9 12 1097 0.49f 0.29 to 0.69 69.11 44 to 83
3.68

10-14 3 377 0.14 −0.23 to 0.52 0 0 to 90
12.82

aNcom: number of comparisons.

bNpar: number of participants.

cNNT: number needed to treat.

dOutliers Sethi (2010) and Sethi (2013) excluded.

eP<.05.

fP<.001.

gP<.01.