Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;19:96. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00488-w

Table 3.

Distribution and predictors of attitudes towards elderly care among the study participants

Variable Positive attitudes (%)# OR (95% CI) p-value AOR (95% CI p - value
Sex 0.613
 Male 83 (69.7)*** 1
 Female 184 (67.2) 0.89 (0.56,1.41)
Age 0.830
 18–24 231 (67.7)*** 1
 25–33 36 (69.2) 1.07 (0.57, 2.601)
Type of the Institution 0.008 0.001
 Public 107 (76.4)** 1.89 (1.18, 3.00) 2.59 (1.45, 4.63)
 Private 160 (63.2) 1 1
Year of study 0.053 0.211
 Second year 155 (72.1)** 1.52 (0.99, 2.33) 1.41 (0.83, 2.39)
 Third year 112 (62.9) 1 1
Marital Status 0.643
 Never married 242 (67.6)*** 1
 Married 25 (71.4) 1.19 (0.56, 2.58)
Home residence < 0.0001 0.010
 Rural 109 (83.2)* 3.26 (1.94, 5.49) 2.23 (1.22, 4.10)
 Urban 158 (60.3) 1 1
Type of family < 0.0001 < 0.0001
 Nuclear family 78 (43.6)* 1 1
 Extended family 189 (88.3) 9.79 (5.87, 16.32) 4.34 (2.33, 8.09)
Currently living with an elderly person at home < 0.0001 < 0.0001
 No 84 (45.9)* 1 1
 Yes 183 (87.1) 7.99 (4.86, 13.14) 3.65 (1.96, 6.78)

#Differences in prevalence was assessed by chi-square test and the p-value obtained were as follows;

* p < 0.0001, ** p < 0.05, *** p ≥ 0.05