Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;15:7509–7521. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S270147

Table 2.

Characterization of Young’s modulus changes with increasing compressive force (indentation depth) for all tissue types

Group/tissue type Young’s modulus for two indentations (xc),
Pa
Curve shift based on xc values Significance
xc1µm xc2µm
Group (I), healthy (A) 56.0 61.1 H **p≤0.01
Group (II), meningothelial meningioma (B) 50.0 52.7 NS (p>0.05)
Group III, fibrous meningioma (C) 62.7 69.0 H *p≤0.05
Group IV, hemangiopericytoma (D) 90.5 95.0 H ***p≤0.001
Group V, metastatic adenocarcinoma (E) 256.7 242.2 L ***p≤0.001
Group VI, glioblastoma (F) 115.2 168.8 H **p≤0.01
Group VII, margin adjacent to glioblastoma (G) 41.1 43.5 H *p≤0.05

Notes: Statistically significant differences between distributions calculated at 1 µm and 2 µm indentation depths tested using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. H — compression stiffening, L — compression softening.

Abbreviations: *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001; ns, p>0.05.