Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 10;146:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.077

Table 1.

Resident ranking of components of the virtual open house (1-5, 1 = very unimportant content, 5 = very important content)

Virtual Open House Components Average (Range +/-)
Overall virtual open house rating 3.81 (0.05)
How important are the following?
Introduction of faculty 3.67 (0.06)
History of program 3.11 (0.07)
Training sites discussion 4.36 (0.04)
Strengths of program discussion 4.47 (0.04)
Weaknesses of program discussion 4.46 (0.05)
Subspecialties offered discussion 4.10 (0.05)
Hospital information discussion 3.90 (0.06)
Media of hospital/city showcase 3.70 (0.06)
Residents participation, Q/A 4.60 (0.04)
Faculty participation, Q/A 3.73 (0.06)