Table 8.
Ecal% vs. Eexp% obtained by PLS, PCR, ANN and CV models, proposed for DFT-B3LYP/6-31G∗∗ along with the residual error (RE).
| Inhibitor | Ci/M | IEexp% |
IEcal% Training set |
IEcal% |
Residual Error (RE) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLS | PCR | ANN | CV | RE.-PLS | RE.-PCR | RE.-ANN | |||
| P1 | 0.5. 10−3 | 17.70 | 40.49 | 19.87 | 23.56 | 21.48 | -22.79 | -2.17 | -5.86 |
| P3 | 0.5. 10−3 | 98.50 | 91.20 | 98.11 | 87.86 | 86.82 | 7.30 | 0.39 | 10.64 |
| P4 | 2.8. 10−3 | 69.05 | 76.70 | 71.13 | 73.43 | 66.00 | -7.65 | -2.08 | -4.38 |
| P5 | 2.3. 10−3 | 82.42 | 78.79 | 81.03 | 78.23 | 75.19 | 3.63 | 1.39 | 4.19 |
| P6 | 2.2. 10−3 | 83.04 | 84.82 | 87.36 | 86.59 | 89.59 | -1.78 | -4.32 | -3.55 |
| P7 | 1.10–3 | 81.10 | 68.33 | 73.89 | 77.21 | 76.78 | 12.77 | 7.21 | 3.89 |
| P8 | 1.10–3 | 97.00 | 90.19 | 97.40 | 93.97 | 94.83 | 6.81 | -0.40 | 3.03 |
| P9 | 1.10–3 | 91.00 | 88.23 | 92.59 | 87.74 | 87.10 | 2.77 | -1.59 | 3.26 |
| P11 | 1.10–3 | 93.00 | 95.41 | 93.00 | 90.41 | 88.51 | -2.41 | 0.00 | 2.59 |
| P12 | 1.10–4 | 90.00 | 93.76 | 90.73 | 95.40 | 97.52 | -3.76 | -0.73 | -5.40 |
| P13 | 1.10–4 | 65.00 | 63.79 | 64.15 | 62.98 | 63.49 | 1.21 | 0.85 | 2.02 |
| P14 | 1.10–4 | 87.00 | 84.26 | 92.83 | 93.57 | 95.00 | 2.74 | -5.83 | -6.57 |
| P17 | 2.2. 10−3 | 95.84 | 89.79 | 98.49 | 96.84 | 96.04 | 6.05 | -2.65 | -1.00 |
| P18 | 2.2. 10−3 | 95.67 | 88.99 | 90.75 | 91.00 | 92.64 | 6.68 | 4.92 | 4.67 |
| P19 | 2.1. 10−3 | 72.64 | 77.09 | 73.68 | 73.49 | 75.69 | -4.45 | -1.04 | -0.85 |
| P20 | 2.1. 10−3 | 85.20 | 82.01 | 82.85 | 83.04 | 83.00 | 3.19 | 2.35 | 2.16 |
| P21 | 1.10–4 | 90.20 | 88.30 | 86.53 | 87.95 | 86.31 | 1.90 | 3.67 | 2.25 |
RE.-PLS: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using PLS.
RE.-PCR: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using PCR.
RE.-ANN: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using ANN.