Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 5;6(10):e05067. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05067

Table 8.

Ecal% vs. Eexp% obtained by PLS, PCR, ANN and CV models, proposed for DFT-B3LYP/6-31G∗∗ along with the residual error (RE).

Inhibitor Ci/M IEexp% IEcal% Training set
IEcal%
Residual Error (RE)
PLS PCR ANN CV RE.-PLS RE.-PCR RE.-ANN
P1 0.5. 10−3 17.70 40.49 19.87 23.56 21.48 -22.79 -2.17 -5.86
P3 0.5. 10−3 98.50 91.20 98.11 87.86 86.82 7.30 0.39 10.64
P4 2.8. 10−3 69.05 76.70 71.13 73.43 66.00 -7.65 -2.08 -4.38
P5 2.3. 10−3 82.42 78.79 81.03 78.23 75.19 3.63 1.39 4.19
P6 2.2. 10−3 83.04 84.82 87.36 86.59 89.59 -1.78 -4.32 -3.55
P7 1.10–3 81.10 68.33 73.89 77.21 76.78 12.77 7.21 3.89
P8 1.10–3 97.00 90.19 97.40 93.97 94.83 6.81 -0.40 3.03
P9 1.10–3 91.00 88.23 92.59 87.74 87.10 2.77 -1.59 3.26
P11 1.10–3 93.00 95.41 93.00 90.41 88.51 -2.41 0.00 2.59
P12 1.10–4 90.00 93.76 90.73 95.40 97.52 -3.76 -0.73 -5.40
P13 1.10–4 65.00 63.79 64.15 62.98 63.49 1.21 0.85 2.02
P14 1.10–4 87.00 84.26 92.83 93.57 95.00 2.74 -5.83 -6.57
P17 2.2. 10−3 95.84 89.79 98.49 96.84 96.04 6.05 -2.65 -1.00
P18 2.2. 10−3 95.67 88.99 90.75 91.00 92.64 6.68 4.92 4.67
P19 2.1. 10−3 72.64 77.09 73.68 73.49 75.69 -4.45 -1.04 -0.85
P20 2.1. 10−3 85.20 82.01 82.85 83.04 83.00 3.19 2.35 2.16
P21 1.10–4 90.20 88.30 86.53 87.95 86.31 1.90 3.67 2.25

RE.-PLS: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using PLS.

RE.-PCR: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using PCR.

RE.-ANN: Residual error between Eexp % and Ecal % obtained by using ANN.