Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov;144:105998. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105998

Table 14.

GRADE assessment – O3 peak exposure and respiratory mortality.

Domain Judgement Down/Up Grade
Limitations in studies 4 included studies. 1 study high risk of bias. Exclusion did not alter significantly the RR and CI (text). No downgrading
Indirectness All studies included the desired population, exposures and outcomes No downgrading
Inconsistency The 80% prediction interval included 1; PI = 2 × CI (Fig. 9). Substantial heterogeneity amongst small number of studies. Downgrade one level
Imprecision The number of person years in the included studies was greater than 940 000 No downgrading
Publication Bias No analysis of publication bias – too few studies (n = 3) No downgrading
Large Effect Size Summary RR = 1.02. Insufficient information on unmeasured potential confounders available No upgrading
Plausible confounding towards null Confounding direction unknown but precision may be affected. No upgrading
Dose-response relation A linear dose–response relationship was assumed in all studies. 95% CI for linear RR included 1. 1 study investigate the dose–response relationship. No evidence to confirm shape of the dose response relationship for Ozone exposure No upgrading
GRADE conclusion No downgrade and no upgrade LOW CERTAINTY EVIDENCE MEAN RR UNADUSTED FOR CO-POLLUTANTS EQUALS 1.02 PER 10μ/m3