TABLE 1.
Control (n = 311) | ACGG intervention (n = 265) | ACGG + ATONU intervention (n = 255) | |
---|---|---|---|
Child age at enrollment, mo | |||
0–12 | 103 (33.1) | 81 (30.8) | 77 (30.2) |
>12–24 | 119 (38.3) | 88 (33.5) | 101 (39.6) |
>24–36 | 89 (28.6) | 94 (35.7) | 77 (30.2) |
Female child | 163 (52.4) | 140 (53.2) | 131 (51.4) |
Lowest wealth quintile | 78 (25.1) | 41 (15.6) | 42 (16.5) |
Highest wealth quintile | 47 (15.1) | 64 (24.3) | 62 (24.3) |
Woman age, y | 29.7 ± 5.6 | 31.7 ± 6.3 | 31.5 ± 6.4 |
Household members, n | 6.2 ± 2.0 | 6.9 ± 1.9 | 6.8 ± 1.9 |
Woman schooling, y | 3.1 ± 3.3 | 3.4 ± 3.9 | 3.5 ± 3.8 |
Livestock at baseline, n | 4.7 ± 4.7 | 7.2 ± 6.0 | 6.7 ± 5.7 |
Improved water | 252 (81.6) | 224 (87.2) | 223 (87.8) |
Improved sanitation | 76 (24.5) | 72 (27.4) | 90 (35.3) |
Values are n (%) for binary/categorical variables and means ± SDs for continuous variables. ACGG, African Chicken Genetic Gains; ATONU, Agriculture to Nutrition.