Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;126(1):29–39. doi: 10.1007/s11547-020-01293-w

Table 2.

Computed tomography findings

All patients (n, 98) Discharged at home (n = 39) Hospitalized and stable (n = 35) Hospitalized in serious condition or died (n = 24) p value Effect
Presence of GGO ± consolidation 86 (87.76%) 35 (89.74%) 32(91.43%) 19 (79.17%)  > 0.05
Bilateral extension 76 (77.55%) 31 (79.49%) 28 (80.0%) 17 (70.83%)  > 0.05
Peripheral distribution 73 (74.49%) 31 (79.49%) 28 (80.0%) 14 (58.33%)  > 0.05
multifocal/patching 48 (48.98%) 23 (58.97%) 17 (48.57%) 8 (33.33%)  > 0.05
Multiple lobes localization 51 (52.04%) 22 (56.41%) 17 (48.57%) 12 (50.0%)  > 0.05
Crazy paving pattern 55 (56.12%) 23 (58.97%) 21 (60.0%) 11 (45.84%)  > 0.05
“Reversed halo” sign 20 (20.41%) 11 (28.21%) 8 (22.86%) 1 (4.17%)  > 0.05
All patients (n, 64) Discharged at home (n = 28) Hospitalized and stable (n = 21) Hospitalized in serious condition or died (n = 15) p value Effect
Volumes
Residual healthy lung parenchyma (%) 70.20 (27.0–94.20) 72.80 (41.0–92.90) 73.20 (28.20–94.20) 55.90 (27.0–86.50) 0.02
GGO (%) 22.80 (4.10–55.50) 23.0 (6.30–34.10) 19.80 (4.10–47.20) 26.90 (8.70–55.50)  > 0.05
Consolidation (%) 1.40 (0.30–13.20) 1.30 (0.30–7.10) 1.2 (0.40–5.40) 3.70 (0.80–13.20) 0.02
Emphysema (%) 0.10 (0.0–11.10) 0.0 (0.0–0.90) 0.30 (0.0–3.80) 0.20 (0.0–11.10)  < 0.01
Radiological severity visual score ≥ 8 16 (25.0%) 5 (17.86%) 3 (14.29%) 8 (53.33%) 0.04
Mild 37 (57.81%) 16 (57.14%) 15 (71.43%) 6 (40.0%)  > 0.05
Moderate 21 (32.81%) 11 (39.28%) 6 (28.57%) 4 (26.67%)
Severe 4 (6.25%) 1 (3.57%) 0 3 (20.0%)
Critical 2 (3.13%) 0 (0.0%) 0 2 (13.33%)

Categorical variables are expressed as counts and percentage in parenthesis. Continuous variables are shown as median and range in parenthesis. Significant p values (< 0.05) are showed in bold type