Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 22;33(4):524–528. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1771163

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing the Bentall procedure vs valve-sparing aortic root replacement a

Variable Bioprosthetic Bentall (n = 36) Mechanical Bentall (n = 63) VSRR (n = 71) P value
Age (years) 63.8 ± 10.4 45.5 ± 12.4 49.2 ± 12.0 <0.001
Men 28 (78%) 49 (78%) 58 (82%) 0.83
BMI (kg/m2) 26.8 ± 4.1 30.3 ± 6.0 28.5 ± 4.7 0.005
Ejection fraction (%) 57.5 (45–67.5) 55 (1562.5) 60 (40–75) 0.003
Bicuspid aortic valve 12 (33%) 22 (35%) 18 (25%) 0.44
Marfan syndrome 1 (3%) 1 (2%) 9 (13%) 0.02
Acute aortic dissection 5 (14%) 10 (16%) 0 <0.001
Aortic insufficiency       0.22
 None 3 (8%) 12 (19%) 12 (17%)  
 Trace/trivial 1 (3%) 2 (3%) 10 (14%)  
 Mild 4 (11%) 9 (14%) 12 (17%)  
 Moderate 10 (28%) 14 (22%) 14 (20%)  
 Severe 18 (50%) 26 (41%) 22 (32%)  
Aortic stenosis 8 (22%) 12 (19%) 2 (3%) 0.001
Aortic root diameter (mm) 50 (34–70) 45.8 (25–67) 51.5 (3190) 0.03
Previous Ross 1 (3%) 9 (15%) 7 (10%) 0.18
Previous CABG 4 (11%) 4 (6%) 1 (1%) 0.07
Prior AV repair/replacement 2 (6%) 17 (27%) 0 <0.001

AV indicates aortic valve; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; VSRR, valve-sparing root replacement.

a

Data are n (%), median (interquartile range), or mean (± 1 standard deviation).