Table 5.
Ability of FRIED-Q to discriminate between frail and non-frail older adults as compared to the FRIED-P
| FRIED-P | Total | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frail | Non-/pre-frail | ||||
| Ability of FRIED-Q to discriminate between frail and pre-frail/non-frail | |||||
| FRIED-Q | |||||
| Frail | |||||
| N | 24 | 4 | 28 | ||
| % | 64.9 | 2.6 | 14.6 | 85.7 | |
| Non-/pre-frail | |||||
| N | 13 | 151 | 164 | ||
| % | 35.1 | 97.4 | 85.4 | 92.1 | |
| Total | |||||
| N | 37 | 155 | 192 | ||
| Sensitivity | |||||
| % | 64.9 | ||||
| Specificity | |||||
| % | 97.4 | ||||
| FRIED-P | Total | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Pre-)Frail | Non-frail | ||||
| Ability of FRIED-Q to discriminate between non-frail and pre-frail/frail | |||||
| FRIED-Q | |||||
| (Pre-)Frail | |||||
| N | 123 | 5 | 128 | ||
| % | 84.2 | 10.9 | 66.7 | 96.1 | |
| Non-frail | |||||
| N | 23 | 41 | 64 | ||
| % | 15.8 | 89.1 | 33.3 | 64.1 | |
| Total | |||||
| N | 146 | 46 | 192 | ||
| Sensitivity | |||||
| % | 84.2 | ||||
| Specificity | |||||
| % | 89.1 | ||||
FRIED-P stands for the Fried Phenotype with slowness and weakness operationalized as performance-based tests. FRIED-Q stands for the Fried Phenotype with slowness and weakness operationalized as self-report questions