Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 20;9(5):272–280. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00610-3

Table 3.

Main elements of the programs

Author Country Year established Mentors Mentees Mentor-mentee ratio Longitudinal program Mandatory Evaluation MERSQI (min 5, max 18) Kirk-patrick levelsc
Blatt et al. [25] USA Physicians and psychosocial professionals MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:4–5 (2:8–9) Y Y Y 11 1, 2, 4
Lutz et al. [37] Germany 2013 Faculty members and near-peers MS‑1 1:4–5 (2:8–9) N N Y N/A 1, 2
Andre et al. [26] USA 2006 Faculty members and MS‑4 MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:11 (4:44) Y Y Y 6.5 1, 2
Varma et al. [39] India 2009 Faculty members MS‑1 1:8–16 N N/A N/A
Kalen et al. [42] Sweden 2007 Physicians MS‑1 to MS‑5 1:4 Y Y Y N/A 1, 2, 3
Duke et al. [27] USA 2015 Faculty members MS‑3 1:9 N Y Y 8 1, 2, 3
Singh et al.a [41] India 2010 Faculty mentors and near-peers MS‑1 1:2 (2:3) N N Y 7.5 1, 2
Boudreau et al.b [35] Canada 2005 Physicians and near-peers MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:3 (2:6) Y Y N/A 1, 2, 3
Taylor et al. [28] USA 2006 MS‑2 MS‑1 1:4 (2:8) N Y Y 8 1, 2
Fleming et al. [29] USA 2011 Faculty members MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:25–28 Y Y Y 6.5 1
Bhatia et al. [40] India 2009 Faculty members MS‑1 1:2–3 N N Y 8 1, 2
Goncalves et al. [43] Brazil 2001 Physicians MS‑1 to MS‑6 1:12–14 Y N Y N/A 1
Usmani et al. [44] Pakistan 2008 Faculty members MS‑1 and MS‑2 1:10 N Y Y 8 1
Elliott et al. [30] USA 2001 Faculty members MS‑1 and MS‑2 1:12 (2:24) N Y Y 6 1, 2
Macaulay et al. [31] USA 2003 Faculty members MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:30 Y Y 6.5 1
Goldstein et al. [32] USA 2004 Faculty members MS‑1 to MS‑4 1:6 Y Y Y N/A 1, 2, 3
Scheckler et al. [33] USA 1985 Faculty members MS‑1 to MS‑4 One mentor per class Y N N/A N/A
Woessner et al. [38] Germany 1995 Faculty members MS from different years 1:12 N N Y 6 1
Median 1:9

Yes: 9

No: 9

Yes: 9

No: 5

Yes: 16

No: 2

Mean 7.4

SD 1.44

MS Medical student; The number following MS denotes the year of the program (e.g. MS‑1 refers to a 1st-year medical student)

Y yes, N no, – no information

aSingh et al. 2010 is the revised version of the mentoring program at the University of Delhi, India, described by Bhatia et al. 2009

bBoudreau et al. 2005 is one of three studies identified in the literature search all describing the physician apprenticeship (PA) program at McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Boudreau et al. 2005 describes the program and the assessment of it to such an extent that the two other studies need not be included in the table.

cKirkpatrick levels; Level 1 refers to the level of reaction or feelings by the learners to all factors in an educational program. Level 2 refers to the changes in the learners caused by participation in the program. Level 3 reveals whether or not the program has created a change in the learners’ behavior. Level 4 indicates if the program is effective in meeting the organizational goals