Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;10:17039. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73675-z

Table 2.

Association of ERP29 rs7114 genotypes, clinical and tumor characteristics of 250 oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Characteristics n ERP29 rs7114
AA AG GG AA or AG GG AA AG or GG
Sex 250
Male 228 135 (59.2%) 79 (34.6%) 14 (6.2%) 214 (93.8%) 14 (6.2%) 135 (59.2%) 93 (40.8%)
Female 22 15 (68.2%) 5 (22.7%) 2 (9.1%) 20 (90.9%) 2 (9.1%) 15 (68.2%) 7 (31.8%)
p-value Reference 0.33 0.67 Reference 0.63 Reference 0.49
Tobacco consumption 250
Smokers 224 135 (60.3%) 76 (33.9%) 13 (5.8%) 211 (94.2%) 13 (5.8%) 135 (60.3%) 89 (39.7%)
Non-smokers 26 15 (57.7%) 8 (30.7%) 3 (11.6%) 23 (88.5%) 3 (11.5%) 15 (57.7%) 11 (42.3%)
p-value Reference 1.00 0.38 Reference 0.22 Reference 0.83
Alcohol consumption 250
Drinkers 197 118 (59.9%) 69 (35.0%) 10 (5.1%) 187 (94.9%) 10 (5.1%) 118 (59.9%) 79 (40.1%)
Abstainers 53 32 (60.4%) 15 (28.3%) 6 (11.3%) 47 (88.7%) 6 (11.3%) 32 (60.4%) 21 (39.6%)
p-value Reference 0.61 0.20 Reference 0.11 Reference 1.00
Histological grade 211*
Well or moderately 176 104 (59.1%) 59 (33.5%) 13 (7.4%) 163 (92.6%) 13 (7.4%) 104 (59.1%) 72 (40.9%)
Poorly or undifferentiated 35 19 (54.3%) 14 (40.0%) 2 (5.7%) 33 (94.3%) 2 (5.7%) 19 (54.3%) 16 (45.7%)
p-value Reference 0.55 1.00 Reference 1.00 Reference 0.70
Tumor stage 245*
I or II 21 10 (47.6%) 11 (52.4%) 0 (0.0%) 21 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 10 (47.6%) 11 (52.4%)
III or IV 224 137 (61.5%) 71 (31.4%) 16 (7.1%) 208 (92.9%) 16 (7.1%) 137 (61.5%) 87 (38.5%)
p-value Reference 0.15 0.60 Reference 0.37 Reference 0.25
Tumor localization 245**
Base of tongue 116 67 (57.8%) 41 (35.3%) 8 (6.9%) 108 (93.1%) 8 (6.9%) 67 (57.7%) 49 (42.3%)
Tonsillar complex 84 52 (61.9%) 26 (30.9%) 6 (7.2%) 78 (92.9%) 6 (7.1%) 52 (61.9%) 32 (38.1%)
Soft palate 45 27 (60.0%) 16 (35.5%) 2 (4.5%) 43 (95.5%) 2 (4.5%) 27 (60.0%) 18 (40.0%)
p-value Reference 0.80 0.83 Reference 0.82 Reference 0.83

n number of patients.

*The number of patients differed from the total quoted in the study (n = 250), because it was not possible to obtain consistent information about histological grade and tumor stage in some cases.

**The number of patients differed from the total quoted in the study (n = 250), because it was considered for analysis only the most frequent tumor localization.