Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2:1–13. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.315

TABLE 3.

Overview of the Reported Willingness of Medical Students to Be Involved in the Response to Global Health Emergencies

Article ID Method of Measuring Willingness Number of Participants Willingness Reported
(% of Students Willing/
Points Scored on Willingness Survey)
Hypothetical or Real
Emergency
Global Health Emergency
Context
Al-Ziftawi (2020)17 Questionnaire 187 33.7 ± 8.99 points (out of 55) which equated to “moderate willingness to be involved” Hypothetical General disaster events
Berhane (2010)19 Questionnaire 375 86% Real H1N1 influenza pandemic
Gouda (2019)23 Questionnaire 274 Natural disaster: 69%
Infectious epidemic: 59.1%
Hypothetical Mixed disasters (natural disaster and infectious epidemic)
Herman (2007)24 Questionnaire 354 69.77% Hypothetical Influenza pandemic
Hwang (2014)25 Discussion based on novel and book reports 50 36% Hypothetical Infectious disease outbreak
Kaiser (2009)26 Questionnaire 523 Natural disaster: 92.5%
Influenza pandemic: 87.8%
Hypothetical Mixed disasters regardless of severity (natural disaster and influenza pandemic)
Markenson (2013)32 Questionnaire 136 “The majority of students responding to the survey were willing to respond to disaster events” Hypothetical General disaster
events
Mortelmans (2009)33 Questionnaire 243 82.30% Hypothetical H5N1 pandemic
Mortelmans (2013)34 Questionnaire 1103 Very infectious: 77.6%
Very dangerous and contagious: 70.4%
Hypothetical Mixed (nuclear, chemical, biological, very infectious outbreak (e.g. H5N1), very dangerous contagious outbreak (eg, Ebola)
Mortelmans (2015)35 Questionnaire 999 Very Infectious: 75.4%
Very dangerous and contagious 43.1%
Hypothetical Infectious disease outbreak of varying severity
Patel (2017)36 Questionnaire 238 Respiratory transmission: 50%
Contact transmission: 61%
Hypothetical Infectious disease outbreak of varying transmission (if PPE were available)
Tebruegge (2010)41 Questionnaire 76 97.40% Hypothetical H1N1