. 2020 Sep 4;12(9):2712. doi: 10.3390/nu12092712

Table 3.

Model coefficient estimations for mediation analyses.

				Consequent
	M (Emotional Eating)			Y₁ (Health)			Y₂ (Mood)			Y₃ (Convenience)			Y₄ (Sensory Appeal)
Antecedent	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	P	Coeff.	SE	p
X (Perceived Stress)	0.043	0.006	<0.001	−0.006	0.005	0.208	0.033	0.005	<0.001	0.023	0.005	<0.001	0.001	0.004	0.775
M (Emotional Eating)	-	-	-	−0.042	0.028	0.144	0.168	0.028	<0.001	0.139	0.024	<0.001	0.062	0.026	0.018
Constant	2.356	0.267	<0.001	3.072	0.219	<0.001	1.694	0.215	<0.001	2.198	0.242	<0.001	3.181	0.202	<0.001
	R² = 0.084			R² = 0.058			R² = 0.159			R² = 0.109			R² = 0.025
	F(6760) = 11.646, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 6.703, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 20.462, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 13.219, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 2.77, p = 0.008
	Consequent
	Y₅ (Natural Content)			Y₆ (Price)			Y₇ (Weight Control)			Y₈ (Familiarity)			Y₉ (Ethical Concern)
Antecedent	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	p	Coeff.	SE	P	Coeff.	SE	p
X (Perceived Stress)	−0.017	0.006	0.003	0.03	0.005	<0.001	−0.008	0.005	0.157	0.015	0.005	0.001	−0.008	0.005	0.142
M (Emotional Eating)	−0.06	0.035	0.09	0.074	0.031	0.016	0.059	0.033	0.072	0.101	0.028	<0.001	0.064	0.033	0.049
Constant	2.813	0.271	<0.001	3.6	0.237	<0.001	2.34	0.252	<0.001	2.573	0.218	<0.001	1.75	0.252	<0.001
	R² = 0.06			R² = 0.132			R² = 0.025			R² = 0.049			R² = 0.059
	F(7759) = 6.841, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 16.506, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 2.78, p = 0.007			F(7759) = 5.607, p < 0.001			F(7759) = 6.815, p < 0.001

After list-wise deletion, data from 769 respondents were analyzed by mediation. Coeff. = unstandardized coefficient for each path in the mediation analyses. SE = standard error.