Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;12(9):981. doi: 10.3390/v12090981

Table 2.

Accuracy and sensitivity of LAMP, qPCR and PCR-RFLP assays for HTLV-1/2.

Groups LAMP qPCR PCR-RFLP
n Accuracy Sensitivity Accuracy Sensitivity Accuracy Sensitivity
Total 1 226 80.5 80.1 75.7 75.1 84.9 84.6
(74.8–85.5) (74.2–85.2) (69.5–81.1) (68.9–80.7) (79.5–89.3) (79.1–90.0)
HTLV-1 164 92.0 89.0 88.1 83.5 94.7 93.9
(87.7–95.2) (83.2–93.4) (83.1–92.0) (77.0–88.9) (90.9–97.2) (89.0–97.0)
HTLV-2 54 89.8 57.4 88.9 53.7 89.8 57.4
(85.1–93.4) (43.2–70.8) (84.1–92.7) (40.0–67.4) (85.1–93.4) (43.2–70.8)
HTLV-1/2 mono-infected 144 88.9 88.9 79.9 79.9 93.1 93.1
(82.6–93.5) (82.6–93.5) (72.4–86.1) (72.4–86.1) (87.6–96.6) (87.6–96.6)
HIV-coinfected 82 65.9 63.6 68.3 66.2 70.4 68.4
(54.6–76.0) (51.9–74.3) (57.1–78.1) (54.6–76.6) (59.2–80.0) (56.8–78.6)

The overall accuracy and sensitivity of HTLV-1/2 LAMP, real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assays are shown in percentage. 95% confidence intervals are presented inside parenthesis. 1 The total number of patients includes non-typed HTLV (n = 5) and indeterminate (n = 3) results.