Table 2.
Performance of each horse in the different tasks. Results are given as the number of successful trials over the total number of trials.
| Individuals | Number of successful trials/total number of trials | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Two-bucket | Three-bucket | Transposition | |
| Flavie | 4/6 | 2/6 | 4/6 |
| Fantasy | 4/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 |
| Filharmonie | 3/6 | 2/6 | 3/6 |
| Furibonde | 3/6 | 4/6 | 3/6 |
| Forever | 5/6 | 2/6 | 4/6 |
| Elegante | 5/6 | 4/6 | 3/6 |
| Estampe | 5/6 | 4/6 | 3/6 |
| Eloge | 3/6 | 2/6 | 4/6 |
| Eclipse | 4/6 | 2/6 | 3/6 |
| Dolly | 2/6 | 4/6 | 1/6 |
| Diva | 2/6 | 1/6 | 4/6 |
| Danseuse | 3/6 | X | 2/6 |
| Cybele | 3/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 |
| Berenice | 6/6 | 4/6 | 5/6 |
| Valentine | 3/6 | 3/6 | 3/6 |
| Victoria | 5/6 | 4/6 | 6/6 |
| N | 16 | 15 | 16 |
| Mean proportion of success | 0.62* | 0.49* | 0.56NS |
| Chance-level | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.33 |
“X” indicates that the horse could not be tested for practical reasons.
Significance was assessed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank:
NS
p > 0.05;
*
p ≤ 0.05.