Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;10(9):1592. doi: 10.3390/ani10091592

Table 4.

Categorical ranking of appropriate stockpersonship measures in the New Zealand cow-calf protocol.

Welfare Criteria Animal Welfare Measure/Indicator Scoring Description Categorical Ranking in New Zealand Study
Stockpersonship animal-based measures on entering and exiting the race Fearful/agitated
Fall
% cows fearful/agitated in the race/forcing pen (climbing on others or attempting to escape)
% cows lying in or falling in race/forcing pen or on exiting
0: 0.0%
1: 0.1–2%
2: >2%
Stumble % cows stumbling when exiting the race/holding pens into paddocks 0: 0–2.0%
1: 2.1–5%
2: >5%
Run % cows running out of the race/holding pens into paddocks 0: 0–5.0%
1: 5.1–10%
2: >10%
Animal handling stockpersonship and resource-based measures Mis-catch (in chute/race) % cows mis-caught with gates on any part of the body either in the race or chute head bale 0: no mis-catch
1: mis-catch ≤1%
2: mis-catch >1%
Hitting % of cows hit or poked with moving aids 0: no hitting
1: occasional/few hit
2: frequent hit/poke (>10% cows)
Noise of handlers
Noise of equipment/machinery
Dogs noise around the yard
Evaluate noise of handlers, noise of equipment (race or chute gate) and machinery (generators etc.) and observe the presence and noise frequency of dogs around the yard 0: no noise/dogs
1: minor audible/occasional noise
2: unpleasantly/ persistent noisy handlers/equip/dogs
Health checks Frequency of health checks on cows during pregnancy 0: daily
1: once-twice/week
2: less than weekly
Yard flow of cattle Yard flow of cattle influenced by handling facilities design/quality 0: very effective cattle flow
1: effective but with flaws
2: difficult flow
Yarding frequency Frequency of yarding of cows per year 0: >4 times
1: 3–4 times
2: 0–2 times