Abstract
Succinylation is a novel post-translational modification identified on many proteins and is involved in multiple biological processes. Succinylation levels are dynamically regulated, balanced by succinylation and desuccinylation processes, and are closely connected to metabolic state in vivo. Sirtuins have been shown to possess NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity in vitro and in vivo, among which the desuccinylation activity of SIRT5 is most extensively studied. Our understanding of the response of succinylation levels to different metabolic conditions, is hampered by the lack of a fast NAD+-dependent desuccinylation assay in a physiological context. In the present study, we therefore optimized and validated a fluorescence-based assay for measuring NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity in cell lysates. Our results demonstrated that shorter and stricter reaction time was critical to approach the initial rate of NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity in crude cell lysate systems, as compared to the desuccinylation reaction of purified His-SIRT5. Analysis of desuccinylation activity in SIRT5 knockout HEK293T cells confirmed the relevance of SIRT5 in cellular desuccinylation activity, as well as the presence of other NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activities. In addition, we were able to analyse desuccinylation and deacetylation activity in multiple cell lines using this assay. We showed a remarkably higher desuccinylase activity, but not deacetylase activity, in proliferative cultured muscle and adipose cells in comparison with their differentiated counterparts. Our results reveal an alteration in NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity under different metabolic states.
Subject terms: Enzyme mechanisms, Enzyme mechanisms, Biochemical assays, Biochemical assays, Energy metabolism
Introduction
Proteins involved in almost all essential life processes undergo different post-translational modifications (PTMs), by which protein structural changes are introduced and the functionality of the proteome is diversified1–3. Post-translational modifications are closely associated with metabolites4–6, and the intimate connection between PTMs and metabolites allow PTMs to integrate different signals to enable rapid responses of the organism to environmental challenges7. Lysine succinylation is a relatively new PTM, identified nearly one decade ago1. It provides a dynamic and relatively abundant network of modifications on both mitochondrial and extra-mitochondrial proteins1,8–10. Lysine residues of many proteins involved in important metabolic processes, such as fatty acid β-oxidation, ketogenesis, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, branched chain amino acids metabolism, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, are subjected to succinylation11–16. In addition, protein succinylation levels respond to metabolic manipulations. For example, succinylation levels in whole-cell extracts and mitochondria in mouse liver were increased under a fasting condition11. In contrast, mouse liver succinylation levels were shown to be significantly decreased17 or variably altered18 by a high fat diet intervention. These results indicate that protein succinylation levels vary with metabolic contexts and are likely to play a role in various signaling processes and regulatory pathways. Therefore, succinylation levels need to be carefully controlled. Sirtuins, a family of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent lysine deacylase, regulate acylation levels in vivo19–23. Thus far, sirtuin (SIRT) 5 and SIRT7 have been shown to be able to remove a succinyl adduct from lysine in the presence of the cofactor NAD+24,25. SIRT5 was identified as a robust desuccinylase24, but it can also remove malonyl and glutaryl adducts from lysine residues with high affinity24,26 and possesses a weak deacetylase activity27. SIRT7 was demonstrated to function as a histone desuccinylase25, and is also able to remove acetyl-group from targets28,29. Since the protein succinylation level can be driven by succinyl-CoA levels5,8,30, as well as NAD+ levels or the NAD+/NADH balance31, it is likely that ultimately a complex interplay between succinyl-CoA, NAD+ and desuccinylase activity dictates lysine succinylation levels15,16. Although changes in succinylation levels have been observed with altered metabolism, it is not completely understood how desuccinylation activity responds to metabolic alterations. Improved understanding would be facilitated by the availability of additional options to assay desuccinylase activity.
A fluorescence based, homogenous, NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity assay to study desuccinylase activity in crude cell lysate directly and rapidly is lacking. Its availability would allow for studying desuccinylation in a physiological context. Fluorogenic assays have been used for identifying activators and inhibitors of recombinant SIRT5 in vitro32–34. Only a limited number of studies analysed desuccinylase activity in the more physiological context of a cell lysate35,36. Notably, NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity in a crude cellular extract has not yet been reported to our knowledge. Here, we optimize and validate a fluorescence-based assay for detecting NAD+-dependent cellular desuccinylase activity. Moreover, we use this assay to gain insights into NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity in different cellular contexts, as well as its relation to global protein succinylation levels.
Results
Optimization and validation of desuccinylation activity in crude cell lysate
We aimed to measure cellular NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity by using the succinylated-fluorogenic reporter substrate (Fig. 1a). Given the complexity of enzymatic reactions in crude cell lysates, we first optimized and validated the assay with a pure recombinant NAD+-dependent desuccinylase protein, His-SIRT5. Levels of desuccinylated peptides increased linearly over time up to 2 h (Fig. 1b), when incubating His-SIRT5 with 10 µM succinyl-substrate and 500 µM NAD+. In addition, the desuccinylation rate of the peptide substrate linearly increased with the His-SIRT5 input when the reaction time was fixed (Fig. 1c). In contrast to the substantial desuccinylation activity of His-SIRT5, its deacetylation activity was virtually undetectable (Fig. 1d). In addition, we performed the assay in the presence of nicotinamide (NAM), a well-known inhibitor of sirtuins. As expected, the desuccinylation activity of His-SIRT5 was negatively impacted by NAM, with an IC50 value of 20.2 µM (Fig. 1e). These results showed that NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity of His-SIRT5 can be analysed well using the succinylated-fluorogenic reporter substrate. We next examined whether the assay set-up for pure His-SIRT5 could be applied to measure desuccinylase activity in a crude cell lysate. Linearity of cellular desuccinylation activity with time was assessed in fibroblasts cell lysates. Desuccinylation of the succinylated-substrate was proportional to reaction time up to 15 min, after which the reaction rate decreased (Fig. 2a), suggesting that an initial reaction rate was reached in the first 15 min. After 15 min, desuccinylated adduct amount again increased linearly with time, but at a slower reaction rate. Based on this, we performed further analyses of desuccinylase activity after 10 min, i.e. within the first 15 min. Desuccinylation by cell lysate after 10 min reaction time increased linearly in a protein-dependent manner (Fig. 2b). Inhibition by NAM of the cellular desuccinylation activity was observed at concentrations higher than 0.1 mM, and maximal inhibition was seen at 2 mM (Fig. 2c). Moreover, the desuccinylase activity was lower in HEK293T SIRT5 knockout cell lysates as compared to wild type cell lysates at all tested reaction time, which ranged from 2.5 to 60 min (Fig. 2d). This result demonstrates that SIRT5 contributes to the desuccinylation activity of the crude cell lysate. Of note, the level of desuccinylated adduct increased over time in the absence of SIRT5 (Fig. 2d), indicating the presence of multiple desuccinylation enzymes in the crude cell lysate. Taken together, our results show that cellular desuccinylation activity can be analysed by the fluorescence-based assay, is dependent on NAD+ and is sensitive to NAM inhibition.
Desuccinylation and deacetylation activities in a range of cells with diverse metabolic states
Cellular succinylation levels were shown to be dynamically affected by metabolism8, whereas little is known about NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity in cells with variable metabolic states. To gain insights into the latter, we analysed the desuccinylation activity by applying the fluorescence-based assay in a variety of cell lines that are commonly used. Desuccinylation activities among the different cell lines ranged from 0.0018 to 0.003 pmol/min/µg protein (Fig. 3a), whereas the deacetylation activities in the same cell lines were approximately tenfold higher (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, desuccinylation activity among the tested cell lines did not differ markedly, whereas differences in the deacetylase activity appeared to larger between the cell types. The deacetylation activity was highest in Caco2 cells and lowest in fibroblasts (Fig. 3b).
A difference in desuccinylation activity between proliferative and differentiated cells
Next, we asked whether cellular differentiation alters desuccinylase activity. In myoblasts differentiated into myotubes, metabolic changes occur with a relative increase in mitochondrial mass37,38. Furthermore, differentiation of preadipocytes to adipocytes results in lipid droplets formation and a relative increase in mitochondrial biogenesis and metabolism39,40. Since SIRT5 is mainly localized in mitochondria, and acylations such as acetylation has been shown to be involved in cell differentiation41,42, desuccinylase activity could play a role in differentiation as well. C2C12 mouse myoblasts were successfully differentiated into myotubes, as can be seen from the longer myotubular structures that were observed after differentiation (Fig. 4a). Also, 3T3-L1 mouse preadipocytes were successfully differentiated into adipocytes, as can be seen from the lipid droplet accumulation in the cytosol of the adipocytes (Fig. 4b). Interestingly, desuccinylation activity in myotubes was around fourfold (P = 0.0002) lower than in the myoblasts (Fig. 4c) and desuccinylase activity in adipocytes was around sixfold (P = 0.0375) lower than that in the preadipocytes (Fig. 4d). In contrast, NAD+-dependent deacetylase activity displayed comparable in myotubes and adipocytes as compared to that in myoblast and preadipocytes, respectively (Fig. 4e,f). Given that the observed NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activities in myotubes and adipocytes were much lower than that in their proliferative counterparts, we aimed to study whether this was reflected in the SIRT5 protein levels. Since mitochondrial biogenesis is closely associated with cell differentiation, and SIRT5 is known to be the non-redundant desuccinylase in mitochondria. We first analysed the expression level of the mitochondrial outer membrane protein, voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC). As expected, protein levels of VDAC (normalised to histone3 level) were increased by around fourfold in both myotubes and adipocytes (Fig. 5a). Unexpectedly, the SIRT5 protein levels (normalised to histone3 level) in myotubes and adipocytes were increased by twofold as compared to their proliferative counterparts (Fig. 5a). Since total desuccinylase activity decreased (Fig. 4c,d) and SIRT5 protein levels increased, we were interested to see how it was reflected in the protein lysine succinylation levels of undifferentiated and differentiated myocytes and adipocytes. Our results show a distinct pattern of lysine succinylation for each cell type (Fig. 5b,c). Band intensity lane profiling of succinylated proteins on blots showed multiple bands with a higher intensity in the myoblasts compared to myotubes (grey areas in Fig. 5b), indicating that higher lysine succinylation levels of these proteins in myoblasts. However, other protein bands were of lower intensity in the myoblasts as compared to the same bands in the myotubes (green areas, Fig. 5b), indicating that lower succinylation levels of these proteins in myoblasts as compared to myotubes. Also when comparing succinylation profiles between preadipocytes and adipocytes, succinylation differences similar to those seen in the muscle cell were observed, with multiple protein bands being of higher intensity in preadipocytes as compared to adipocytes (grey areas, Fig. 5c), while this was the other way around for other proteins (red areas, Fig. 5c). Taken together, in differentiated myotubes and adipocytes, the overall desuccinylation activity was decreased, the SIRT5 protein level was increased and protein lysine succinylation profiles changed differentially.
Discussion
The complex interplay between metabolite-driven succinylation and NAD+-dependent desuccinylation gives opportunities to cells to regulate protein function based on metabolic state of the cells. To get more insights into these processes, we optimized a desuccinylase assay in cell lysates and applied our method to different cell types and conditions. We showed that a stricter reaction time was required to analyse initial rate in crude cell lysates as compared to recombinant His-SIRT5, that SIRT5 was responsible partially for the observed NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity, and that NAD+-dependent desuccinylation activity varied with physiologic states. NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity was higher in proliferative myoblasts and preadipocytes as compared to their differentiated counterparts.
Protein acetylation has been demonstrated to act as a regulator of cell differentiation from myoblast to myotubes41 as well as from preadipocyte to adipocytes42. Acetylation of histones is regulated by deacetylases and acetyltransferase to maintain, activate or repress gene transcription programs43–45. Although succinylation has been identified on histones, and NAD+-dependent desuccinylation by SIRT7 of specific histone marks regulated DNA damage repair pathway25, it is not known whether there is a general role for succinylation and desuccinylation in regulating cell differentiation. Our findings that NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activities are higher in proliferative cells as compared to their differentiated counterparts, suggest that desuccinylation could play a role in the differentiation process. Interestingly, the NAD+-dependent desuccinylase protein, SIRT5, has been shown to support proliferative tumor cell growth in in vitro as well as in vivo models46–48. SIRT5 has also been found to be upregulated in different tumor types and its increased expression was proposed as a marker for recurrence in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)49,50.
In our study, we identified a mismatch between SIRT5 protein expression level and NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity. SIRT5 protein was expressed higher in differentiated cells as compared to proliferative cells, whereas desuccinylase activity was lower. The increased SIRT5 protein level in differentiated myotubes and adipocytes, could be explained by the fact that SIRT5 is primarily located in mitochondria11, and that increased mitochondrial biogenesis is associated with both myogenesis37 as well as adipogenesis39. In support of this, protein levels of VDAC, an abundant mitochondrial outer membrane protein, were increased in differentiated cells as compared to proliferative cells. Interestingly, that the increased protein expression of SIRT5 did not translate into a higher NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity could implicate that mitochondria-localized SIRT5 is post-translationally modified to be inactive. Since we analysed enzymatic activity in cell lysates and added external NAD+, NAD+ could not be a limitation for the analysed desuccinylase activity. Instead, SIRT5 could be regulated by PTMs or could be inhibited by interaction with other proteins that are part of a SIRT5 regulatory complex. Although only a limited number of SIRT5 protein interactors in the mitochondria have been identified in a large screen for mitochondrial sirtuin interactions51, it is possible that these interactors could have a role in altering the desuccinylation activity of SIRT5. For SIRT1, post-translational modifications and their impacts have been studied extensively. For example, phosphorylation on several SIRT1 sites could translocate SIRT1 and redirect it to specific targets with enhanced its enzymatic function52,53. Additionally, other PTMs have also been demonstrated to affect SIRT1 level or activity, including sumoylation54, carbonylation55, and methylation56. Another explanation for the mismatch between the SIRT5 expression and the desuccinylase activity could be that mitochondrial SIRT5 is not the main contributor to overall NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity in myoblasts and preadipocytes. Indeed, when analysing NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity in cell lysates of HEK293T SIRT5 KO cells, we observed substantial NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity, whereas SIRT5 protein was not detectable. These findings highlight the importance of analysing NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity, over only analysing expression of the protein or gene.
It has become apparent that sirtuin proteins have versatile deacylase activity21,24,57. Sirtuin members share deacylase activities among each other, but also specific deacylase, ADP-ribosyltransferase58,59 and lipoamidase60 activities have been identified for sirtuins. Deacetylation activity is shared by SIRT119, SIRT222, and SIRT320. Desuccinylation has been identified, apart from SIRT5 and SIRT7, for SIRT3 and SIRT4 although these sirtuins only displayed minor desuccinylation activity against a succinylated lysine peptide in vitro61.
The versatility in enzymatic activity of sirtuins is also apparent from studies on SIRT6, which has both deacetylase activity as well as de-fatty acylase activity and ADP-ribosyltransferase activity59,62,63. Specific mutations of SIRT6 identified in tumors could even predispose for one activity over the other64. In our cell lines and physiological conditions tested, the NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activities of cell lysates were approximately tenfold lower than the NAD+-dependent deacetylase activities. Interestingly, the deacetylase activity did not change upon differentiation, whereas desuccinylase activity was different. Interestingly, in our study, we even identified two distinct desuccinylation reaction rates in cell lysates, one initial high activity and a second slower one. This could possibly be explained by differential substrate-binding affinity by multiple desuccinylases. Further studies are needed to explore the desuccinylation potential of specific proteins.
Overall, we optimized a fluorescence-based assay for detecting cellular NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity, and demonstrated that NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity is lowered in differentiated myotubes and adipocytes. The observed mismatch between SIRT5 protein expression level and NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity highlights the relevance of analysing sirtuin enzymatic activities in physiological contexts. The high desuccinylase activity in proliferating cells is of relevance to analyse how desuccinylase activity contributes to tumor cell function and how sirtuins with NAD+-dependent desuccinylase activity are regulated during proliferation and differentiation.
Material and methods
His-SIRT5 expression and purification
The human His-SIRT5 (6 × His) plasmid was a gift from Cheryl Arrowsmith (Addgene plasmid # 25487). Human SIRT5 gene is inserted into the vector pET28a-LIC, and six histidine residues are fused into the SIRT5 protein on N terminal, and the plasmid is resistant to kanamycin. The plasmid was transformed into chemical competent E. coli BL21 by heat shock as previously published65, with minor modifications. Briefly, 1 µg of plasmid DNA was added to 50 µl competent E. coli BL21 cells, incubated for 30 min on ice, heat-shocked for 11 s at 42 °C and returned to ice for 5 min. After the cells were incubated in 950 µl Lysogeny broth (LB) medium for 1 h at 37 °C. 100 µl of the transformation mix was plated on LB agar plates containing 50 µg/ml kanamycin and incubated overnight at 37 °C. For His-SIRT5 protein expression level, a single colony was inoculated in 3 ml LB medium with 50 µg/ml kanamycin, incubated for 8 h at 37 °C with shaking at 220 rpm using an incubator shaker (G25, New Brunswick Scientific), and the bacterial starter culture was stored at 4 °C. Next day, 100 µl of bacterial starter culture was inoculated to 100 ml LB medium with 50 µg/ml kanamycin in a 300 ml Erlenmeyer flask, incubated at 37 °C with shaking at 220 rpm until an OD600 of 0.25, after which the cultures were placed at 22 °C and Isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. Cells were harvested 18 h after IPTG induction by centrifugation at 6000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. For purification of His-SIRT5, 3–4 mg of E.coli pellet was resuspended in 3 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, and 1 mg/ml lysozyme) and incubated end-over-end for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were then sonicated at 40% amplitude (burst of 1 s followed by 3 s interval) for 5 min on ice using a digital sonifier (Branson SLPe). Insoluble debris in the cell lysate was removed by centrifugation at 8500 × g and 4 °C for 15 min. Imidazole/HCl at pH 8.0 was added to the supernatant to a final concentration of 30 mM. Crude His-SIRT5 was purified using HisLink protein purification resin (#V8823, Promega) in combination with a chromatography column (#731-1150, Bio-Rad). The protein purification resin consists of microporous silica resin which contains a high level of tetradentate-chelated nickel and can purify polyhistidine-tagged recombinant proteins efficiently. To purify crude His-SIRT5, 0.4 ml of the HisLink protein purification resin was loaded to a chromatography column, then the resin was first equilibrated by washing five times with washing buffer (25 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, and 30 mM imidazole). E. coli lysate was then loaded onto the equilibrated column and was allowed to pass through, and this step was repeated once. Then, the column was washed five times with the washing buffer, and His-SIRT5 was eluted with 200 µl of elution buffer (25 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, and 500 mM imidazole). Elution fractions were checked for SIRT5 content using gel electrophoresis and Coomassie staining (Supplementary Fig. 1). Prior to use in further experiments, imidazole was removed from the eluted His-SIRT5 using ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter units (#UFC501096, Merck Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, 50 µl of eluted His-SIRT5 was loaded to a filter column, and 450 µl of exchange buffer (25 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0 and 100 mM NaCl) was added, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The flow through was discarded and another 450 µl of exchange buffer was added to the column and the same centrifugation step was repeated once. Then the His-SIRT5 was collected by reverse centrifugation in an Eppendorf tube at 1000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration of His-SIRT5 was determined using a Bradford protein assay (#23200, Thermo Scientific), after which the His-SIRT5 was preserved in 1 × freezing buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM DTT, and 20% glycerol) and aliquoted with 10 µl/tube and the aliquots were stored at − 80 °C until use.
Cell culture
Murine 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (ATCC, #CL-173) were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in 3T3-L1 medium, which consisted of DMEM (#11880-028, Gibco) supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS, #06Q3501K, Gibco), 4.5 g/l glucose (#G7021, Sigma-Aldrich), 4 mM l-glutamine (#25030-024, Gibco) and an antibiotic–antimycotic mix (10,000 units/ml of penicillin, 10,000 µg/ml of streptomycin, and 25 µg/ml Amphotericin B, #15240-062, Gibco). For differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (8,000 cells/well) were first seeded in 6-well plates in 3T3-L1 medium, and differentiation was started 48 h after the preadipocytes reached 100% confluency by switching to 3T3-L1 differentiation medium (2 ml/well) in the same culture plates. The 3T3-L1 differentiation medium consisted of 3T3-L1 medium supplemented with a final concentration of 1 µM insulin (#I0516, Sigma-Aldrich), 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (#5879, Sigma-Aldrich), 1 µM dexamethasone (#D4902, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1 µM 15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (#D8440, Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were cultured in the differentiation medium for 48 h, then in differentiation maintaining medium (3T3-L1 medium containing 1 µM insulin) until the cells were harvested at day 11 of differentiation.
Murine C2C12 myoblasts (ATCC, #CRL-1772) were cultured in C2C12 growth medium, consisted of DMEM (#11960-044, Gibco) supplemented with 25 mM HEPES (#15630080, Thermo Scientific), 10% FBS, and antibiotic–antimycotic mix. For differentiation of myoblasts into myotubes, myoblasts (3 × 105 cells/well) were first seeded in a 6-well plate in the C2C12 growth medium, and differentiation of myoblasts was started when the myoblasts reached 90% confluency by switching to C2C12 differentiation medium that contained 2% horse serum (#26050070, Gibco) instead of 10% FBS. Cells were cultured in the C2C12 differentiation medium until harvest at day 6 of differentiation.
Generation of SIRT5 knockout HEK293T cells
SIRT5 knockout HEK293T cells were generated using the CRISPR-Cas9 system following the directions outline in Ran et al.66. Briefly, sgRNA against SIRT5 oligos (sequence: GGCTGCTGGGTACACCACAG) were resuspended in water, annealed, then phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Then, the ligated oligos and PX459 vector were digested and ligated together using BbsI and the T7 ligase, respectively. HEK293T cells (ATCC, #CRL-11268), cultured following ATCC guidelines, were transfected with the PX459-sgRNA vector using Lipofectamine 3000 according to manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected cells were selected using puromycin (3 µg/ml) for 48 h. To achieve single-cell colonies, cells remaining after selection were diluted to a density of 50 cells/10 ml of media, and 100 µl of the diluted cell suspension per well was plated to 96-well plates. SIRT5 status in the colonies were assessed using immunoblotting. Colonies lacking SIRT5 protein were then sequenced to confirm Cas9-mediated genomic alterations at the location targeted by the sgRNA. Colonies with SIRT5 levels comparable to WT HEK293T cells were used as controls for SIRT5 KO cells.
Desuccinylation activity assays
Desuccinylation activity was measured using a fluorogenic reporter assay. Succinylated-substrate (#BML-KI590), assay buffer (#BML-KI286-0020), developer concentrate (20x, #BML-KI105), NAD+ (#BML-KI282), and NAM (#BML-KI283-0500) were all purchased from Enzo. Assay reagents were prepared freshly in the assay buffer prior to the assay and were kept on ice until use.
For desuccinylase activity in cells, trypsinized, washed and pelleted cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0,137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitor (#04693159001, Roche)) and sonicated on ice at 40% amplitude (burst of 1 s followed by 3 s cooling) for 12 bursts using a Branson SLPe digital sonifier. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g, 4 °C for 10 min, and the supernatants were used in further experiments. Samples were equalized with lysis buffer on protein concentration after determination using DC protein assays (#5000116, Bio-Rad). Protein input for each sample in the desuccinylase reaction was indicated in the figure legends. Prior to use in desuccinylation reaction, 28 µl of cell lysates were incubated at a 37 °C water bath with shaking at 60 rpm (Shaking water bath, VWR) in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes for 10 min to degrade endogenous NAD+, then 0.6 µl of 50 mM dithiothreitol67 dissolved in assay buffer was added to all cell lysates, and incubation continued for an additional 5 min. The catalytic reactions were performed at 37 °C with shaking at 60 rpm, initiated by adding 28 µl of pre-warmed (37 °C) 20 µM succinyl-substrate (final concentration of 10 µM) in combination with either 1 mM NAD+ (final concentration of 500 µM) or assay buffer only (negative control). After adding the substrates, the tubes were vortexed at 2200 rpm for 2 s with a Minishaker (IKA MS2) and then placed at the 37 °C water bath. The reactions were stopped after 10 min, unless stated otherwise, by adding 56 µl of 1 × developer containing 2 mM NAM, vortexing at 2200 rpm for 2 s, then incubating at 25 °C for 15 min. Finally, 100 µl of each sample was loaded onto half-area black 96-well plates (#3686, Corning) and the fluorescence was read with excitation at 360 nm and emission at 460 nm at 25 °C on a Biotek Synergy HT microplate reader. Fluorescence signal of the negative control group was subtracted from each experimental sample. To analyse the desuccinylation activity of His-SIRT5, the same procedure was followed as for cell lysate, but instead of cell lysates, purified recombinant His-SIRT5 was used. The amount of His-SIRT5 used in each assay was indicated in figure legends.
NAM sensitivity of desuccinylation activity
For analysing NAM sensitivity of cellular desuccinylation activity, the assay procedure was the same as desuccinylation assay described above, with a slightly different reaction system composition, as follows: 14 µl cell lysate (187.3 µg), 28 µl of 20 µM succinylated-substrate containing 1 mM NAD+, and 14 µl NAM (0.04–4000 µM, resulting in a final concentration in the reaction system of 0.01–1000 µM). The reaction was stopped with either 56 µl 1 × developer (experimental samples) or 56 µl 1 × developer containing 2 mM NAM (negative control sample). The fluorescence signal was subtracted from signal in the negative control group, which consisted of 14 µl cell lysate, 28 µl succinylated-substrate without NAD+ and 14 µl assay buffer. The same procedure was used to analyse NAM sensitivity of His-SIRT5 desuccinylation activity, except that His-SIRT5 (0.06 µg) was used instead of cell lysate.
Deacetylation activity assay
Deacetylation activities of cell lysates and recombinant His-SIRT5 were determined similarly to the desuccinylation activity, except that an acetylated-fluorogenic substrate (#BML-KI179, Enzo) rather than a succinylated-substrate was used and 1 × developer II (#BML-KI176-1250, Enzo) was used to stop the deacetylation reaction.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.4) containing deacylase inhibitors (1 µM trichostatin A and 10 mM NAM) as well as protease inhibitor cocktail (#04693159001, Roche) by sonication on ice, the cell lysate sonication procedure was the same as described in the Desuccinylation activity assays section. Samples were equalized to the same protein level with the lysis buffer following quantification by DC protein assays. Cell lysates (30 µg protein) were separated on NuPAGE 4–12% gradient gels (#NP0322, Thermo Scientific) at 110 V for 35 min, followed by 150 V for 40 min at room temperature. After which, proteins on the gel were immediately transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 300 mA for 1 h on ice. Antibodies against SIRT5 (#8782, Cell Signaling Technology), succinyllysine (#401, PTM Biolabs), voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (#ab14734, Abcam) and Histone 3 (#9715, Cell Signaling Technology) were used to identify the respective targets. IRDye Donkey anti-rabbit (#926-32213, LI-COR Biosciences) and Goat anti-mouse (#926-32210, LI-COR Biosciences) were used and signals were detected using an Odyssey scanner (LI-COR). Lane profile analyses was performed using Image J 1.51p.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.04. Data was compared using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. Data represent mean ± SEM. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
TY has received financial support from the China Scholarship Council (Grant no. 201606350170). AG was supported by T32 AG000114. Generation of the SIRT5 KO cells in the Lombard lab was supported by R01GM101171. His-SIRT5 plasmid was a gift from Cheryl Arrowsmith (Addgene plasmid # 25487).
Author contributions
T.Y. performed all experiments, analysed all data, drafted and wrote the manuscript. A.G. and D.L. generated and provided essential experimental resources. J.K. and V.B. supervised study, discussed data and edited manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its “Supplementary Information” files).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-72833-7.
References
- 1.Zhang Z, et al. Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:58–63. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walsh CT, Garneau-Tsodikova S, Gatto GJ., Jr Protein posttranslational modifications: The chemistry of proteome diversifications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2005;44:7342–7372. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eshun-Wilson L, et al. Effects of α-tubulin acetylation on microtubule structure and stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:10366–10371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900441116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pougovkina O, et al. Mitochondrial protein acetylation is driven by acetyl-CoA from fatty acid oxidation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23:3513–3522. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li F, et al. NADP(+)-IDH mutations promote hypersuccinylation that impairs mitochondria respiration and induces apoptosis resistance. Mol. Cell. 2015;60:661–675. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wagner GR, Payne RM. Widespread and enzyme-independent Nepsilon-acetylation and Nepsilon-succinylation of proteins in the chemical conditions of the mitochondrial matrix. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:29036–29045. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.486753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lin H, Caroll KS. Introduction: Posttranslational protein modification. Chem. Rev. 2018;118:887–888. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weinert BT, et al. Lysine succinylation is a frequently occurring modification in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and extensively overlaps with acetylation. Cell Rep. 2013;4:842–851. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xie Z, et al. Lysine succinylation and lysine malonylation in histones. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2012;11:100–107. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smestad J, Erber L, Chen Y, Maher LJ. Chromatin succinylation correlates with active gene expression and is perturbed by defective TCA cycle metabolism. iScience. 2018;2:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Park J, et al. SIRT5-mediated lysine desuccinylation impacts diverse metabolic pathways. Mol. Cell. 2013;50:919–930. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rardin MJ, et al. SIRT5 regulates the mitochondrial lysine succinylome and metabolic networks. Cell Metab. 2013;18:920–933. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sadhukhan S, et al. Metabolomics-assisted proteomics identifies succinylation and SIRT5 as important regulators of cardiac function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:4320–4325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519858113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hershberger KA, et al. Sirtuin 5 is required for mouse survival in response to cardiac pressure overload. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:19767–19781. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.809897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen H, et al. Mild metabolic perturbations alter succinylation of mitochondrial proteins. J. Neurosci. Res. 2017 doi: 10.1002/jnr.24103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gibson GE, et al. Alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex-dependent succinylation of proteins in neurons and neuronal cell lines. J. Neurochem. 2015;134:86–96. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meyer JG, et al. Temporal dynamics of liver mitochondrial protein acetylation and succinylation and metabolites due to high fat diet and/or excess glucose or fructose. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0208973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bentley NL, et al. Protein hypoacylation induced by Sirt5 overexpression has minimal metabolic effect in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:1349–1355. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vaziri H, et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149–159. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00527-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Onyango P, Celic I, McCaffery JM, Boeke JD, Feinberg AP. SIRT3, a human SIR2 homologue, is an NAD-dependent deacetylase localized to mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:13653–13658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222538099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Anderson KA, et al. SIRT4 is a lysine deacylase that controls leucine metabolism and insulin secretion. Cell Metab. 2017;25:838–855.e815. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.North BJ, Marshall BL, Borra MT, Denu JM, Verdin E. The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin deacetylase. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:437–444. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Houtkooper RH, Pirinen E, Auwerx J. Sirtuins as regulators of metabolism and healthspan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:225–238. doi: 10.1038/nrm3293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Du J, et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334:806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1207861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Li L, et al. SIRT7 is a histone desuccinylase that functionally links to chromatin compaction and genome stability. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12235. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tan M, et al. Lysine Glutarylation is a protein posttranslational modification regulated by SIRT5. Cell Metab. 2014;19:605–617. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakagawa T, Lomb DJ, Haigis MC, Guarente L. SIRT5 deacetylates carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 and regulates the urea cycle. Cell. 2009;137:560–570. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ryu D, et al. A SIRT7-dependent acetylation switch of GABPbeta1 controls mitochondrial function. Cell Metab. 2014;20:856–869. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu J, et al. Regulation of serine-threonine kinase Akt activation by NAD(+)-dependent deacetylase SIRT7. Cell Rep. 2017;18:1229–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wagner GR, et al. A class of reactive Acyl-CoA Species reveals the non-enzymatic origins of protein acylation. Cell Metab. 2017;25:823. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Houtkooper RH, Canto C, Wanders RJ, Auwerx J. The secret life of NAD+: An old metabolite controlling new metabolic signaling pathways. Endocr. Rev. 2010;31:194–223. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schuster S, et al. A continuous sirtuin activity assay without any coupling to enzymatic or chemical reactions. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22643. doi: 10.1038/srep22643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Madsen AS, Olsen CA. Substrates for efficient fluorometric screening employing the NAD-dependent sirtuin 5 lysine deacylase (KDAC) enzyme. J. Med. Chem. 2012;55:5582–5590. doi: 10.1021/jm300526r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maurer B, et al. Inhibitors of the NAD(+)-Dependent protein desuccinylase and demalonylase Sirt5. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:1050–1053. doi: 10.1021/ml3002709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pacella-Ince L, Zander-Fox DL, Lane M. Mitochondrial SIRT5 is present in follicular cells and is altered by reduced ovarian reserve and advanced maternal age. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2014;26:1072–1083. doi: 10.1071/RD13178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Polletta L, et al. SIRT5 regulation of ammonia-induced autophagy and mitophagy. Autophagy. 2015;11:253–270. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1009778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Remels AH, et al. Regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2010;315:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kraft CS, et al. Control of mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2006;290:C1119–1127. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00463.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wilson-Fritch L, et al. Mitochondrial biogenesis and remodeling during adipogenesis and in response to the insulin sensitizer rosiglitazone. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:1085–1094. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.1085-1094.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tormos KV, et al. Mitochondrial complex III ROS regulate adipocyte differentiation. Cell Metab. 2011;14:537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mal A, Harter ML. MyoD is functionally linked to the silencing of a muscle-specific regulatory gene prior to skeletal myogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:1735–1739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437843100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yoo EJ, Chung JJ, Choe SS, Kim KH, Kim JB. Down-regulation of histone deacetylases stimulates adipocyte differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:6608–6615. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508982200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Verdone L, Agricola E, Caserta M, Di Mauro E. Histone acetylation in gene regulation. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic. 2006;5:209–221. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/ell028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mehrotra S, et al. Histone hypoacetylation-activated genes are repressed by acetyl-CoA- and chromatin-mediated mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1839;751–763:2014. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.05.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Brownell JE, et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: A homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996;84:843–851. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Du Z, et al. Targeting a Sirt5-positive subpopulation overcomes multidrug resistance in wild-type Kras colorectal carcinomas. Cell Rep. 2018;22:2677–2689. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang X, et al. SHMT2 Desuccinylation by SIRT5 drives cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2018;78:372–386. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lv XB, et al. SUN2 exerts tumor suppressor functions by suppressing the Warburg effect in lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:17940. doi: 10.1038/srep17940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lu WD, Zuo Y, Feng YF, Zhang M. SIRT5 facilitates cancer cell growth and drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Tumor Biol. 2014;35:10699–10705. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2372-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kumar S, Lombard DB. Functions of the sirtuin deacylase SIRT5 in normal physiology and pathobiology. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018;53:311–334. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2018.1458071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yang W, et al. Mitochondrial sirtuin network reveals dynamic SIRT3-dependent deacetylation in response to membrane depolarization. Cell. 2016;167:985–1000.e1021. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nasrin N, et al. JNK1 phosphorylates SIRT1 and promotes its enzymatic activity. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sasaki T, et al. Phosphorylation regulates SIRT1 function. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e4020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yang Y, et al. SIRT1 sumoylation regulates its deacetylase activity and cellular response to genotoxic stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:1253–1262. doi: 10.1038/ncb1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Caito S, et al. SIRT1 is a redox-sensitive deacetylase that is post-translationally modified by oxidants and carbonyl stress. FASEB J. 2010;24:3145–3159. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-151308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu X, et al. Methyltransferase Set7/9 regulates p53 activity by interacting with Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:1925–1930. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019619108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kumar S, Lombard DB. Mitochondrial sirtuins and their relationships with metabolic disease and cancer. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015;22:1060–1077. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.6213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Haigis MC, et al. SIRT4 inhibits glutamate dehydrogenase and opposes the effects of calorie restriction in pancreatic beta cells. Cell. 2006;126:941–954. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Liszt G, Ford E, Kurtev M, Guarente L. Mouse Sir2 homolog SIRT6 is a nuclear ADP-ribosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21313–21320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413296200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mathias RA, et al. Sirtuin 4 is a lipoamidase regulating pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity. Cell. 2014;159:1615–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Feldman JL, Baeza J, Denu JM. Activation of the protein deacetylase SIRT6 by long-chain fatty acids and widespread deacylation by mammalian sirtuins. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:31350–31356. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C113.511261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Michishita E, et al. SIRT6 is a histone H3 lysine 9 deacetylase that modulates telomeric chromatin. Nature. 2008;452:492–496. doi: 10.1038/nature06736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jiang H, et al. SIRT6 regulates TNF-alpha secretion through hydrolysis of long-chain fatty acyl lysine. Nature. 2013;496:110–113. doi: 10.1038/nature12038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kugel S, et al. Identification of and molecular basis for SIRT6 loss-of-function point mutations in cancer. Cell Rep. 2015;13:479–488. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kumar S, Lombard DB. Generation and purification of catalytically active recombinant Sirtuin5 (SIRT5) protein. Methods Mol. Biol. 2016;1436:241–257. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3667-0_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ran FA, et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hu J, He B, Bhargava S, Lin H. A fluorogenic assay for screening Sirt6 modulators. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013;11:5213–5216. doi: 10.1039/c3ob41138a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its “Supplementary Information” files).