Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;13:509. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04396-5

Table 1.

Results from the meta-analysis of cyathostomin prevalence and relative abundance data

Prevalence Relative abundance
Species < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Species*Region < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Species*Method < 0.0001 < 0.0001

Notes: P-values for ‘Species’ main effect and interaction terms, species by region (‘Species*Region’) and species by specimen collection method (‘Species*Method’) effects on grand mean prevalence and grand mean relative abundance least squares means estimates. Significant P-values in bold