Table 2.
Pairwise comparisons of prevalence (%) for 35 cyathostomin and selected strongylin species across 38 publications, 49 datasets, and 1592 equine hosts examined
| LSM | CL lower | CL upper | P-value | Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species categorized as ‘High’ | |||||
| Cylicocyclus nassatus | 93.4 | 90.5 | 96.3 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Cylicostephanus longibursatus | 92.9 | 86.6 | 99.1 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Cyathostomum catinatum | 90.6 | 87.1 | 94.1 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Species categorized as ‘Medium’ | |||||
| Cylicostephanus goldi | 81.8 | 77.0 | 86.7 | < 0.0001 | B |
| Coronocyclus coronatus | 76.7 | 73.3 | 80.1 | < 0.0001 | B |
| Cylicostephanus calicatus | 76.5 | 70.9 | 82.1 | < 0.0001 | B |
| Cylicostephanus minutus | 71.4 | 65.8 | 77.1 | < 0.0001 | B, C |
| Cylicocyclus leptostomum | 62.6 | 56.4 | 68.8 | < 0.0001 | C |
| Species categorized as ‘Low’ | |||||
| Cylicocyclus insigne | 36.0 | 30.3 | 41.7 | < 0.0001 | D |
| Coronocyclus labratus | 31.0 | 24.9 | 37.2 | < 0.0001 | D, E |
| Cyathostomum pateratum | 30.1 | 25.4 | 34.7 | < 0.0001 | D, E |
| Coronocyclus labiatus | 28.7 | 24.4 | 33.1 | < 0.0001 | D, E, F |
| Cylicocyclus ashworthi | 23.6 | 18.8 | 28.5 | < 0.0001 | E, F, G |
| Species categorized as ‘Very low’ | |||||
| Poteriostomum imparidentatum | 17.9 | 8.7 | 27.2 | 0.0002 | E, F, G, H |
| Cylicodontophorus bicoronatus | 16.3 | 12.9 | 19.6 | < 0.0001 | F, G, H |
| Parapoteriostomum euproctus | 12.4 | 9.9 | 14.8 | < 0.0001 | F, G, H |
| Petrovinema poculatum | 12.3 | 8.2 | 16.4 | < 0.0001 | F, G, H |
| Triodontophorus tenuicollis | 12.0 | 4.1 | 19.9 | 0.003 | F, G, H, I |
| Cylicostephanus asymetricus | 11.6 | 5.8 | 17.3 | < 0.0001 | G, H, I |
| Cylicocyclus brevicapsulatus | 11.1 | 8.2 | 14.1 | < 0.0001 | G, H, I |
| Parapoteriostomum mettami | 11.0 | 6.3 | 15.7 | < 0.0001 | G, H, I |
| Triodontophorus serratus | 7.9 | 3.0 | 12.8 | 0.002 | H, I |
| Cylicocyclus elongatus | 6.3 | 1.8 | 10.7 | 0.006 | H, I |
| Triodontophorus nipponicus | 6.1 | 5.5 | 6.7 | < 0.0001 | H, I |
| Triodontophorus brevicauda | 5.7 | 1.2 | 10.3 | 0.01 | H, I |
| Cylicocyclus radiatus | 5.4 | 2.3 | 8.4 | 0.0007 | H, I |
| Poteriostomum ratzii | 5.3 | 4.2 | 6.4 | < 0.0001 | H, I |
| Cylicocyclus ultrajectinus | 4.6 | 2.8 | 6.4 | < 0.0001 | H, I |
| Gyalocephalus capitatus | 2.3 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 0.01 | H, I |
| Cylicostephanus hybridus | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.03 | H, I |
| Cylicocyclus auriculatus | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.1 | < 0.0001 | H, I |
| Cyathostomum tetracanthum | 0 | 0 | 1.8 | 0.9 | H, I |
| Tridentoinfundibulum gobi | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.1 | H, I |
| Cyathostomum alveatum | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | I |
| Cylicostephanus bidentatus | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0.3 | I |
Notes: Significance is considered at α = 0.05. Data are presented as Tukey-Kramer adjusted least squares means estimates (LSM), confidence interval limits (CL), P-values, and conservative T-statistic groupings (Group). Significant P-values in bold. Groups with same letters are not statistically different