Table 3.
Pairwise comparisons of grand mean relative abundance (%) for 35 cyathostomin and selected strongylin species across 29 publications, 35 datasets, and 1217 equine hosts examined
| LSM | CL lower | CL upper | P-value | Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species categorized as ‘High’ | |||||
| Cylicocyclus nassatus | 20.31 | 16.53 | 24.47 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Cylicostephanus longibursatus | 19.18 | 15.14 | 23.69 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Cyathostomum catinatum | 16.39 | 14.15 | 18.80 | < 0.0001 | A |
| Species categorized as ‘Medium’ | |||||
| Cylicostephanus goldi | 5.98 | 5.07 | 6.97 | < 0.0001 | B |
| Cylicostephanus minutus | 4.37 | 3.48 | 5.37 | < 0.0001 | B, C |
| Cylicocyclus leptostomum | 4.04 | 2.56 | 5.87 | < 0.0001 | B, C |
| Coronocyclus coronatus | 3.76 | 2.93 | 4.69 | < 0.0001 | B, C |
| Cylicostephanus calicatus | 3.40 | 1.87 | 5.38 | < 0.0001 | B, C, D |
| Species categorized as ‘Low’ | |||||
| Cylicocyclus insigne | 2.08 | 0.95 | 3.63 | < 0.0001 | C, D |
| Cyathostomum pateratum | 1.26 | 0.80 | 1.81 | < 0.0001 | D |
| Coronocyclus labiatus | 1.18 | 0.71 | 1.76 | < 0.0001 | D |
| Cylicocyclus ashworthi | 0.70 | 0.39 | 1.09 | < 0.0001 | D, E |
| Coronocyclus labratus | 0.65 | 0.41 | 0.94 | < 0.0001 | D, E |
| Species categorized as ‘Very low’ | |||||
| Poteriostomum imparidentatum | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.56 | < 0.0001 | D, E, F |
| Cylicocyclus ultrajectinus | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.0002 | E, F, G |
| Cylicocyclus elongatus | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.24 | < 0.0001 | E, F, G |
| Cylicodontophorus bicoronatus | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.19 | < 0.0001 | E, F, G |
| Cylicocyclus radiatus | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.01 | E, F, G |
| Cylicocyclus brevicapsulatus | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.02 | E, F, G |
| Poteriostomum ratzii | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.001 | E, F, G |
| Parapoteriostomum mettami | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | < 0.0001 | E, F, G |
| Parapoteriostomum euproctus | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 | < 0.0001 | E, F, G |
| Petrovinema poculatum | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.04 | E, F, G |
| Triodontophorus serratus | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | E, F, G |
| Cyathostomum tetracanthum | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.4 | E, F, G |
| Triodontophorus brevicauda | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | < 0.0001 | F, G |
| Cylicostephanus bidentatus | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.001 | F, G |
| Cylicostephanus hybridus | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.001 | F, G |
| Cylicostephanus asymetricus | 0.005 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.0004 | F, G |
| Triodontophorus nipponicus | 0.004 | 0.00 | 0.01 | < 0.0001 | F, G |
| Triodontophorus tenuicollis | 0.003 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.2 | F, G |
| Gyalocephalus capitatus | 0.0008 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.8 | G |
| Cylicocyclus auriculatus | 0.00004 | 0.00 | 0.00 | < 0.0001 | G |
| Tridentoinfundibulum gobi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | G |
| Cyathostomum alveatum | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.4 | G |
Notes: Significance is considered at critical value, α = 0.05. Data are presented as Tukey-Kramer adjusted least squares means estimates (LSM), confidence interval limits (CL), P-values, and conservative T-statistic groupings (Group). Significant P-values in bold. Groups with same letters are not statistically different