Table 1.
Animal Models | 2D Cell Culture | 3D Cell Culture | |
---|---|---|---|
Cost | Relatively high expenses are relied on for the purchase of animals but also for housing and breeding, in addition to being time consuming. | Has potential for lower costs than in vivo experiments and involves relatively simple manipulations. | Often more expensive than 2D cell cultures. Some techniques can be technically demanding and time consuming. |
Ethical concerns regarding animal welfare | Many ethical concerns are involved in animal testing because of the pain and distress experienced by models in certain protocols. | Cell culture has the potential to reduce animal testing and spare animal lives. However, the possible use of animal serum raises concerns for animal welfare and human biosafety. | Similar to 2D platforms. |
Gene expression | Reflective of animals in vivo. Can differ from humans | Lower expression levels and numerous variations from in vivo and 3D gene expression. | More reflective of in vivo gene expression, thus contributing to better tissue-specific functions than 2D systems. |
Morphology | Reflective of animals in vivo. Can differ from humans | Restrictions encountered in 2D environments cause changes in cell morphology and induce an artificial apical–basal polarity. | A three-plane environment allows for the development of complex morphologies. |
In vivo imitation | N/A | 2D systems do not accurately mimic the natural 3D microenvironment of cells. This leads to misleading and unpredictable data for in vivo responses. | 3D cell cultures allow for a better representation of the in vivo organization than 2D systems, resulting in more physiologically relevant data. |
Transferability to humans | Controversial. Some very important discoveries for humans had been made using animals. However, animal models are sometimes inefficient to predict human in vivo responses, especially for toxicity studies. | Using human cells minimizes the questionability of transferability of in vitro data to humans and opens doors for personalized medicine. | 3D platforms can produce results using human cells in physiological contexts which can lead to high translational potential of the discoveries. |
Complexity of environment | Whole organisms are highly complex, thus implying potential unknown interactions. | Low complexity. Often more easily interpretable results. | Intermediate, leading to more relevant data than 2D systems, while controlling most interactions. |
Tumour modeling | Helpful models to study tumours. | Cannot accurately replicate characteristics of the tumoural microenvironment. | Suitable for the development of tumour models. |
Reproducibility | Not satisfactory, especially in preclinical research. | High reproducibility potential, but decreased by the use of animal serum. | Various 3D techniques offer lower reproducibility than 2D platforms, although high reproducibility is achievable (e.g., hanging drop technique). Reproducibility seems diminished by the use of animal-derived scaffolds or serums. |
High throughput agreement | Small animals can be suitable for high throughput screening. | Easily suitable for high throughput screening. | For a long time, difficult to adapt for high throughput screening. New technologies (e.g., tissue chips/microphysiological systems) render them more accessible. Automation is possible but at higher costs. |
Vascularization | Reflective of in vivo. Advantageous for tumour and angiogenesis studies. | Lack of vascularization. | Endothelialization of 3D tissues is possible for certain techniques and could improve graft take in addition to being useful for tumour and angiogenesis studies. |
Immune system interactions | Presence of interactions. However, immunodeficient models cannot adequately reflect interactions normally encountered with an entirely intact immune component. | Usually no interactions. Low complexity interactions can be encountered in 2D co-cultures with immune cells. | Potential for higher interactions than 2D systems. Incorporation of immunogenic components like immune cells and lymphatic capillaries are being explored to establish 3D systems with more complex in vivo-like interactions with the immune system. |