Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 25;11:574137. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.574137

TABLE 2.

Effect of probiotic exposure on the abundance of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus ASVs and genera in preterm infants.

Cohort† Postmenstrual Probiotic-exposed: Percent days
age Postmenstrual age on antibiotics

Taxa β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
Bifidobacterium 7.74 (−1.31, 16.8) 0.132 (8.45e-04, 0.263) −0.122 (−0.0285, 0.0416) 0.00133 (−0.00938, 0.0964)
Bifidobacteriumlongum ASV 202 9.84 (0.560, 19.1)* 0.153 (0.0534, 0.252)** −0.129 (−0.305, 0.0462) −0.0751 (−0.226, 0.0754)
Bifidobacteriumlongum ASV 203 29.0 (10.5, 47.5)** 0.476 (0.295, 0.658)*** −0.487 (−0.845, −0.129)** −0.00342 (−0.228, 0.159)
Bifidobacteriumbifidum ASV 204 15.6 (7.04, 24.2)*** 0.233 (0.134, 0.332)*** −0.228 (−0.390, −0.0647)** −0.0650 (−0.195, 0.0648)
Bifidobacteriumbreve ASV 205 21.12 (7.01, 35.4)** 0.243 (0.105, 0.382)*** −0.323 (−0.593, −0.0538)* −0.160 (−0.367, 0.0480)
Sum of other Bifidobacterium ASVs −0.0484 (−12.8, 12.7) 0.0923 (-0.0268, 0.211) 0.00325 (−0.242, 0.249) 0.0264 (−0.0654, 0.118)
Lactobacillus 6.82 (−6.29, 19.9) 0.0785 (−0.0261, 0.183) −0.117 (−0.371, 0.136) −0.170 (−0.320, −0.0206)*
Lactobacillus ASV 2940 4.50 (−10.2, 19.2) 0.0688 (−0.0494, 0.187) −0.0723 (−0.355, 0.210) −0.174 (−0.322, −0.0258)*
Other Lactobacillus −17.0 (−38.9, 4.96) 0.00255 (−0.0689, 0.120) 0.0358 (−0.0738, 0.790) −0.0243 (−0.457, −0.0282)*

Negative binomial regression was used to model Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus count data with an offset for sequencing depth. Comparison of probiotic-exposed preterm infants to unexposed preterm infants. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001.