Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;77(4):385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.008

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation only, clinical evaluation integrated with lung ultrasonographic findings, and RT-PCR.

Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Positive Predictive Value (95% CI) Negative Predictive Value (95% CI) Positive Likelihood Ratio (95% CI) Negative Likelihood Ratio (95% CI)
Clinical evaluation only 81.3 (72.6–88.2) 63.6 (54.4–72.2) 66.4 (57.6–74.4) 79.4 (70–86.9) 2.24 (1.7–2.9) 0.29 (0.19–0.45)
C-LUS integrated assessment 94.4 (88.2–97.9) 95 (89.5–98.2) 94.4 (88.2–97.9) 95 (89.5–98.2) 19 (8.7–41.6) 0.06 (0.03–0.13)
RT-PCR 80.4 (71.6–87.4) 100 100 85.2 (78.3–90.6) NA 0.20 (0.13–0.29)

NA, Not applicable.

RT-PCR specificity was 100% by study design (no CIs estimated).