Table 2.
Survey responses from attending radiologists, trainees, and referring clinicians
| Survey Question | Combined Reading Rooms, Median (p25, p75) | Body Reading Room, Median (p25, p75) | Neuroradiological Reading Room, Median (p25, p75) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attending radiologist | |||
| The reading room meets my interpretation needs. | 4.0 (2.5, 4.0) | 4.0 (2.75, 4.0) | 3.0 (2.5, 4.0) |
| The reading room meets my consultation needs. | 4.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 4.0 (2.5, 4.5) |
| The reading room meets my teaching needs. | 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) | 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) | 4.0 (2.0, 4.5) |
| The reading room is distracting. | 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) | 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) | 3.0 (2.5, 4.0) |
| The reading room facilitates awareness of trainee’s educational or workload assistance needs. | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 4.0 (3.0, 4.0) |
| Trainees | |||
| The reading room supports independent reading. | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) | 1.0 (1.0, 1.0) |
| The reading room facilitates interaction with and access to my attending radiologist. | 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) |
| The reading room is distracting. | 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 3.25) | 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) |
| Do you feel the reading room facilitates your attending radiologist’s awareness of your workload? (Yes or no) | 86.3% (Yes, n = 19) 15.8% (No, n = 3) |
85.0% (Yes, n = 17) 17.6% (No, n = 3) |
100.0% (Yes, n = 2) 0.0% (No, n = 0) |
| Referring clinicians | |||
| The reading room is welcoming. | 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 5.0) | N/A |
| It was easy to find a radiologist to help me. | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | N/A |
| The radiologist seemed to have enough time to help me. | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | N/A |
| The in-person consultation was useful. | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | 5.0 (5.0, 5.0) | N/A |
Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = strongly agree, 4 = somewhat agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 1 = strongly disagree. N/A = not applicable.