Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;13:3601–3609. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S275847

Table 4.

Association of the Combined Effect the Menopausal Status and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration on Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome According to Dietary Macronutrient Consumption

Obesity Metabolic Syndrome
Premenopausal Status
(n = 4030)
Postmenopausal Status
(n = 4296)
Premenopausal Status
(n = 4030)
Postmenopausal Status
(n = 4296)
CHO Low 1.278
(0.926–1.764)
1.158
(0.838–1.601)
1.432
(0.880–2.329)
1.260
(0.930–1.708)
High 0.810
(0.538–1.220)
1.428
(1.145–1.780)**
1.080
(0.631–1.847)
1.261
(1.013–1.570)*
Protein Low 0.928
(0.627–1.374)
1.385
(1.091–1.756)**
1.120
(0.667–1.881)
1.266
(1.008–1.590)*
High 1.191
(0.858–1.654)
1.268
(0.964–1.668)
1.400
(0.859–2.282)
1.243
(0.949–1.628)
Fat Low 0.809
(0.551–1.189)
1.434
(1.150–1.788)**
0.938
(0.554–1.586)
1.239
(1.004–1.529)*
High 1.319
(0.941–1.847)
1.141
(0.837–1.556)
1.561
(0.938–2.598)
1.332
(0.969–1.830)

Notes: The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated in reference to a serum vitamin D concentration ≥50 nmol/L using a multinomial logistic regression model after adjusting for age, education level, household income, marital status, residential region, subjective stress level, dietary supplement consumption, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, and physical activity (*p<0.05, ** p<0.01).