Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2020 May 14;115(12):2357–2368. doi: 10.1111/add.15084

Table 2.

Adjusted associations between exposure to e-cigarette advertisements and price responsiveness among adolescents (n=1,063).

Price Responsiveness
OR 95% CI p
E-cigarette ad theme
Control (Bottled Water) ref --
General 1.14 (0.77, 1.69) 0.507
Flavor & Taste 0.95 (0.64, 1.40) 0.789
People & Product Use 0.76 (0.52, 1.13) 0.178
Prior ad exposure 1.12 (1.03, 1.22) 0.007
Female 1.14 (0.86, 1.51) 0.376
Age
13–14 ref --
15–17 1.50 (1.02, 2.19) 0.037
18 1.10 (0.73, 1.64) 0.654
Race/ethnicity
NH African American or Black ref --
NH White 1.22 (0.82, 1.79) 0.326
NH multiracial or other race/ethnicity 1.54 (0.99, 2.40) 0.055
Hispanic 0.82 (0.52, 1.31) 0.415
Smoker 2.04 (1.49, 2.81) <0.001
Past-month e-cigarette use 3.00 (1.96, 4.59) <0.001
Past-month alcohol use 1.14 (0.79, 1.65) 0.467
Past-month cannabis use 1.50 (1.05, 2.14) 0.025
Brief sensation seeking scale 2.19 (1.75, 2.75) <0.001

Notes: OR=Adjusted Odds Ratio. 95% CI=95% confidence interval. The price responsiveness indicator is defined as whether or not a participant’s probability of purchasing e-cigarettes changes from “probably would buy” to “probably not buy” as prices increases. p<0.05.

Symbols represent a significant difference between the two advertising themes, assessed using Wald tests (p<0.05).