Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr 11;19(1):155–161.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.014

Table 2.

Multilevel Models Predicting Physical and Mental QOL in ESLD Dyads (N=132)

Physical QOL (Model 1) Mental QOL (Model 2)
Patient Caregiver Patient Caregiver
B (SE) B (SE) B (SE) B (SE)
Patient Characteristics
Gender (women) 1.76 (1.95) 2.82 (1.96) −1.73 (2.07) 0.32 (2.31)
Age 0.13 (0.08) −0.20 (0.08)* 0.26 (0.08)** 0.14 (0.09)
Years Cirrhosis −0.16 (0.13) −0.19 (0.13) −0.16 (0.14) −0.01 (0.15)
MELD-Na −0.25 (0.19) −0.13 (0.19) 0.03 (0.21) 0.04 (0.23)
Charlson 0.18 (0.42) −0.50 (0.43) 0.25 (0.44) 0.16 (0.50)
Hepatic −3.86 (1.65)* 0.88 (1.67) −2.02 (1.76) −0.81 (1.97)
Encephalopathy (amanaged vs no history)
Ascites (managed vs none) −3.47 (1.83) −1.94 (1.85) −3.15 (1.94) −1.98 (2.18)
Ascites (refractory vs none) −9.19 (2.28)*** −5.41 (2.33)* −3.46 (2.42) −1.86(2.75)
Uncertainty −0.14 (0.05)** 0.06 (0.05) −0.31 (0.06)*** −0.15 (0.06)*
Relationship quality −3.26 (1.33)* 1.91 (1.37) 1.69 (1.41) 1.94 (1.61)
Caregiver Characteristics
Gender (women) 3.09 (2.20) 0.96 (1.37) −3.05 (2.34) −0.56 (2.61)
Spouse Caregiver 2.34 (1.82) 1.48 (1.86) −2.46 (1.94) −5.04 (2.19)*
Uncertainty −0.10 (0.06) −0.16 (0.06)** 0.06 (0.06) −0.02 (0.07)
Relationship quality 0.66 (1.12) −0.19 (1.13) 2.73 (1.19)* 2.51 (1.33)

Note. Higher scores indicate greater uncertainty and better relationship quality.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

a

Results did not differ when liver etiology included.

MELD-Na = Model for End-Stage Liver Disease including sodium.