Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr 13;29(2):600–607. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05990-x

Table 1.

Comparison of overall femoral condyle height changes measured using TEA, GCA and IHA methods. Values of mean ± standard deviation are presented.

0°–45° 45°–90° 90°–120°

Medial Lateral Medial Lateral Medial Lateral
TEA −0.6±3.1#* 0.4±2.0#* −4.4±2.5ab& −2.2±2.0ab& −5.3±1.8ab −3.3±1.8ab
GCA −3.0±1.8bc#* −2.3±2.0bc#* −0.5±1.6 −0.7±2.1 −0.2±1.2 −0.4±1.4
IHA −0.4±1.9 −0.8±2.1 0.2±1.6 0.3±2.1 −1.0±1.1 −0.2±1.4

Note:

a:

p<0.05 between TEA and GCA

b:

p<0.05 between TEA and IHA

c:

p<0.05 between GCA and IHA

#:

p<0.05 between 0–45° and 45–90°

&:

p<0.05 between 45–90° and 90–120°

*:

p<0.05 between 0–45° and 90–120°