Table 1.
Comparison of overall femoral condyle height changes measured using TEA, GCA and IHA methods. Values of mean ± standard deviation are presented.
0°–45° | 45°–90° | 90°–120° | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medial | Lateral | Medial | Lateral | Medial | Lateral | |
TEA | −0.6±3.1#* | 0.4±2.0#* | −4.4±2.5ab& | −2.2±2.0ab& | −5.3±1.8ab | −3.3±1.8ab |
GCA | −3.0±1.8bc#* | −2.3±2.0bc#* | −0.5±1.6 | −0.7±2.1 | −0.2±1.2 | −0.4±1.4 |
IHA | −0.4±1.9 | −0.8±2.1 | 0.2±1.6 | 0.3±2.1 | −1.0±1.1 | −0.2±1.4 |
Note:
p<0.05 between TEA and GCA
p<0.05 between TEA and IHA
p<0.05 between GCA and IHA
p<0.05 between 0–45° and 45–90°
p<0.05 between 45–90° and 90–120°
p<0.05 between 0–45° and 90–120°