Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 24;28:102445. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102445

Table 1.

Summary of the available evaluation (ZURICH and DRESDEN) and training (Rou2 and PhIng) data with number of cases (BL, FU pairs) with and without new or enlarged lesions, mean new or enlarged lesion count per case, mean lesion size and mean time between the two scans (BL and FU). For the DRESDEN data the values for an additional evaluation between time point one and four are also given (DRESDEN 1-4).

Sets #cases #new/enl. lesions #new/enl. Lesion per case lesion size follow-up time
Training sets:
Rou2 (without SIEM. all cases 1444 2447 1.69 (±4.59) 1.16 (±0.60) yr.
Verio, Ph. Ingenia) cases with > 1 lesion 614 2447 3.98 (±6.36) 0.18 (±0.54) ml
PhIng (Ph. Ingenia) all cases 130 288 2.21 (±5.60) 0.98 (±0.38) yr.
cases with > 1 lesion 55 288 5.23 (±7.68) 0.19 (±0.50) ml



Evaluation sets:
ZURICH all cases 89 209 2.34 (±4.44) 2.24 (±1.17) yr.
(Ph. Ingenia) cases with > 1 lesion 51 209 4.09 (±5.23) 0.13 (±0.14) ml
DRESDEN all cases 96 157 1.67 (±2.49) 1.01 (±0.08) yr.
(SIEM. Verio) cases with > 1 lesion 53 157 2.96 (±2.69) 0.13 (±0.18) ml
DRESDEN 14 all cases 32 108 3.36 (±3.74) 3.02 (±0.12) yr.
(SIEM. Verio) cases with > 1 lesion 26 108 4.13 (±3.75) 0.12 (±0.19) ml