Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):862. doi: 10.3390/antiox9090862

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Evaluation of mitochondrial number and area of WT and NHERF1 KO proximal tubules. (A) Number of mitochondria were counted in random 4× visual fields with the highest density of mitochondria. Data are means ± SEM (WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 5). The mitochondria number of NHERF1 KO proximal tubules was insignificant when compared to WT. (B) Mitochondria area was calculated using electron microscopy (EM) images and Image J. Data are means ± SEM (WT n = 6) and (NHERF1 KO n = 5). Mitochondria area of NHERF1 KO proximal tubules were insignificant when compared to WT.