Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):704. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090704

Table 1.

Main features of the included studies in the current meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Number of Patients Cut-Off for PD-L1 (Positive/High
Expression)
Cut-Off for TIL
(Positive/High
Expression)
PD-L1 Evaluation Method TILs Evaluation Method Follow-Up
Time
Endpoint Number of Patients with Experience of ICIs
1 M. Okabe [18] 2017 Japan 21 H-score > 3 ≥50% IHC IHC 127.3 OS/DFS 0
2 N. AiErken [17] 2017 China 215 positive (>1) (41% to 100%) IHC IHC 67.7 (7–159) OS/DFS N/a
3 R. K. Beckers [16] 2015 Australia 161 H-score >100 (score 3) > 60% IHC H&E 55 (0–213) OS/DFS N/a
4 H. Mori [15] 2017 Japan 248 ≥50% ≥50% IHC H&E 68 (2–150) OS/DFS N/a
5 M. V. Dieci [13] 2018 Italy 43 ≥5% ≥10% IHC H&E unclear OS N/a
6 J. Yeong [14] 2019 Singapore 269 unclear unclear IHC IHC 97 (1–213) OS/DFS N/a
7 X. Ren [27] 2018 China 195 >25% (score 3) > 60% IHC H&E unclear OS/DFS N/a

Abbreviations: PD-L1: programmed death-ligand 1, TIL: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, ICIs: immune checkpoint inhibitors, N/a: not available, IHC: immunohistochemistry, H&E: hematoxylin and eosin.