Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):1300. doi: 10.3390/foods9091300

Table 1.

Reference method results of quality parameters in tomato paste samples from 4 different companies at the 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2019 production seasons.

Company Year Number of Samples NTSS pH Bostwick TA Serum Viscosity c Lycopene Glucose Fructose Ascorbic Acid Citric Acid
A 2015 120 range 25.6–36.0 4.3–4.5 2.5–10.8 1.0–1.9 2.3–2.6
Avg a ± std b 30.7 ± 2.8 4.4 ± 0.0 5.1 ± 2.0 1.5 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.1
2016 150 range 25.8–37.1 4.2–4.4 1.6–9.1 1.1–2.0 2.1–2.9 70.3–116.6 75.9–117.6 56.8–97.0 6.3–10.6
avg ± std 30.1 ± 2.8 4.3 ± 0.1 4.1 ± 1.9 1.5 ± 0.2 2.6 ± 0.2 93.3 ± 10.3 96.4 ± 9.6 77.6 ± 8.9 8.4 ± 0.9
2017 196 range 25.4–37.0 4.2–4.5 0.8–11.9 1.0–1.8 2.2–2.8 74.1–128.2 75.2–130.5 49.0–110.7 6.4–11.7
avg ± std 28.6 ± 2.4 4.4 ± 0.0 3.5 ± 2.2 1.3 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1 92.0 ± 11.5 92.3 ± 11.0 79.4 ± 10.9 8.4 ± 0.9
2019 87 range 25.7–38.0 4.2–4.5 1.5–9.2 1.1–2.1 2.3–2.8 400.6–869.1
avg ± std 31.1 ± 2.8 4.4 ± 0.1 5.4 ± 2.1 1.4 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.2 644.5 ± 112.1
General 553 range 25.4–38.0 4.2–4.5 0.8–11.9 1.0–2.1 2.1–2.9 70.3–128.2 75.2–130.5 49.0–110.7 6.3–11.7
avg ± std 29.8 ± 2.9 4.4 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 2.2 1.4 ± 0.2 2.5 ± 0.1 92.6 ± 11.0 94.1 ± 10.6 78.7 ± 10.1 8.4 ± 0.9
B 2016 79 range 28.5–37.5 4.1–4.5 4.0–7.6 1.3 -2.2 1.9–2.4 88.1–120.1 92.1–121.4 59.7–104.8 6.8–10.4
avg ± std 32.2 ± 2.9 4.3 ± 0.1 5.6–1.2 1.6 ± 0.3 2.1 ± 0.2 104.0 ± 9.0 104.9 ± 7.8 75.6 ± 8.9 8.4 ± 0.9
2017 116 range 28.0–36.2 4.1–4.5 1.1–6.4 1.3 -1.9 1.8–2.4 87.0–128.0 94.0–128.8 55.8–98.4 5.9–10.0
avg ± std 30.6 ± 1.2 4.4 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 1.1 1.6 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.2 102.4 ± 6.0 101 ± 5.2 78.8 ± 11.1 8.3 ± 0.7
2019 103 range 24.1–38.1 4.2–4.5 1.2–8.5 1.0–1.9 1.8–2.6
avg ± std 31.6 ± 4.3 4.4 ± 0.1 4.3 ± 2.1 1.5 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.2
General 298 range 24.1–38.1 4.1–4.5 1.1–8.5 1.0–2.2 1.8–2.6 87.0–128.0 92.1–128.8 55.8–104.8 5.9–10.4
avg ± std 31.5 ± 3.0 4.3 ± 0.1 4.8 ± 1.6 1.6 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.2 102.0 ± 7.4 102.6 ± 6.6 77.5 ± 10.4 8.3 ± 0.8
C 2016 222 range 27.8–37.5 4.1–4.5 2.3–7.9 1.5–2.2 1.9–2.5 81.2–122.6 89.2–128.0 32.6–100.7 7.8–9.6
avg ± std 31.0 ± 1.9 4.3 ± 0.1 4.4 ± 1.3 1.8 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.2 95.9 ± 8.8 101.0 ± 7.9 65.5 ± 12.8 8.6 ± 0.4
2017 290 range 26.0–36.5 4.1–4.5 0.8–7.1 1.3–2.4 1.9–2.7 71.0–122.9 77.8–123.8 13.5–109.8 7.1–11.2
avg ± std 29.1 ± 2.8 4.4 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.2 90.6 ± 12.6 94.4 ± 12.1 55.0 ± 19.9 8.5 ± 1.1
2019 110 range 26.1–31.6 4.2–4.5 1.0–4.9 1.3–2.3 1.9–2.7 614.3–829.3
avg ± std 29.2 ± 2.1 4.4 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 1.2 1.7 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 690.9 ± 43.6
General 622 range 26.0–37.5 4.1–4.5 0.8–7.9 1.3–2.4 1.9–2.7 71.0–127.9 77.8–128.0 13.5–109.8 7.1–11.2
avg ± std 29.8 ± 2.6 4.4 ± 0.1 3.5 ± 1.6 1.8 ± 0.2 2.3 ± 0.2 92.9 ± 11.4 97.3 ± 10.9 59.6 ± 17.9 8.6 ± 0.8
D 2015 47 range 25.0–26.6 4.2–4.4 1.1–2.4 1.3–1.5 2.6–2.7
avg ± std 25.9 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.0 1.8 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.0 2.7 ± 0.0
2016 48 range 25.3–26.5 4.4–4.5 2.3–2.9 1.3–1.4 2.9–3.0 76.9–84.6 78.1–89.0 43.9–63.4 5.9–7.1
avg ± std 26 ± 0.3 4.4 ±0.0 2.6 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.0 3.0 ± 0.0 80.7 ± 1.8 83.5 ± 2.7 50.8 ± 5.3 6.5 ± 0.3
2017 203 range 25.1–28.5 4.3–4.5 1.0–2.9 1.2–1.6 2.4–2.9 67.5–99.3 74.7–100.6 12.1–72.2 6.6–8.8
avg ± std 26.2 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.0 1.9 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 80.7 ± 6.9 82.4 ± 3.9 38.0 ± 13.0 7.4 ± 0.4
2019 72 range 25.3–28.3 4.3–4.5 1.4–2.2 1.3–1.5 2.5–2.9
avg ± std 26.5 ± 1.0 4.4 ± 0.0 1.9 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1
General 370 range 25.0–28.5 4.2–4.5 1.0–2.9 1.2–1.6 2.4–3.0 67.5–104.3 74.7–100.6 12.1–72.2 5.9–8.8
avg ± std 26.2 ± 0.8 4.4 ± 0.0 2.0 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.1 2.7 ± 0.1 80.7 ± 6.2 82.6 ± 3.7 40.4 ± 12.9 7.2 ± 0.5

a mean. b standard deviation. c The unit of the serum viscosity results is log cSt. Lycopene analysis was only carried out in 2019 for two companies. Sugar and acid analyses with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were only carried out in 2016 and 2017. Each test was carried out in duplicate. NTSS: natural tomato soluble solids, TA: titratable acidity.